Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · low code bpm rpa · Alternatives

Power Apps Component Framework alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 low code bpm rpa are named by companies instead of Power Apps Component Framework: Microsoft Power Platform by 3,102 companies, Microsoft Power Apps by 2,520, Salesforce Platform by 1,181.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Power Apps Component Framework, companies in postings
173
Most used alternative
Microsoft Power Platform · 3,102
Fastest hiring, 90 days
Microsoft Power Platform
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

low code bpm rpa companies choose instead of Power Apps Component Framework

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs Power Apps Component Frameworkpostings, 90 dCompare
1
3,1021793%10,336Power Apps Component Framework vs Microsoft Power Platform →
2
2,5201457%8,256Power Apps Component Framework vs Microsoft Power Apps →
3
1,181683%3,478Power Apps Component Framework vs Salesforce Platform →
4
AirtableAirtable
947547%1,944Power Apps Component Framework vs Airtable →
5
929537%2,742Power Apps Component Framework vs Microsoft Dataverse →
6
BPMNObject Management Group
896518%1,817Power Apps Component Framework vs BPMN →
7
UiPathUiPath
806466%2,305Power Apps Component Framework vs UiPath →
8
Automation AnywhereAutomation Anywhere
265153%634Power Apps Component Framework vs Automation Anywhere →
9
CamundaCamunda
256148%686Power Apps Component Framework vs Camunda →
10
256148%874Power Apps Component Framework vs Signavio →
11
Pega PlatformPegasystems
245142%1,670Power Apps Component Framework vs Pega Platform →
12
216125%598Power Apps Component Framework vs Oracle APEX →
13
RetoolRetool
213123%291Power Apps Component Framework vs Retool →
14
201116%525Power Apps Component Framework vs Blue Prism →
15
AppianAppian
198114%764Power Apps Component Framework vs Appian →
16
CelonisCelonis
186108%930Power Apps Component Framework vs Celonis →
17
182105%536Power Apps Component Framework vs Microsoft Power Pages →
18
FileMakerClaris
16394%282Power Apps Component Framework vs FileMaker →
19
15489%334Power Apps Component Framework vs Microsoft AI Builder →
20
ARISSoftware AG
14182%348Power Apps Component Framework vs ARIS →
21
13880%282Power Apps Component Framework vs Oracle Visual Builder →
22
QuickbaseQuickbase
12773%321Power Apps Component Framework vs Quickbase →
23
MendixSiemens
12572%728soon
24
OutSystemsOutSystems
12371%638soon
25
12271%291soon
26
BizagiBizagi
11164%170soon
27
Power FxMicrosoft
9957%169soon
28
DroolsRed Hat
9655%618soon
29
9052%257soon
30
8951%297soon
31
NintexNintex
7443%132soon
32
BPELOASIS
7242%87soon
33
6638%89soon
34
6538%170soon
35
AppSheetGoogle
6135%262soon
36
5934%156soon
37
5733%148soon
38
5431%100soon
39
ADONISBOC Group
4828%90soon
14,906 companies name a low code bpm rpa in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on Power Apps Component Framework users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 low code bpm rpa are named by companies instead of Power Apps Component Framework: Microsoft Power Platform by 3,102 companies, Microsoft Power Apps by 2,520, Salesforce Platform by 1,181, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/power-apps-component-framework/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

Power Apps Component Framework alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to Power Apps Component Framework?

Microsoft Power Platform: 3,102 companies name it in their own job postings, against 173 for Power Apps Component Framework.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on Power Apps Component Framework
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market