Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · backend frameworks · Alternatives

Quarkus alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 backend frameworks are named by companies instead of Quarkus: Spring Boot by 4,174 companies, ASP.NET by 3,338, FastAPI by 3,305.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Quarkus, companies in postings
281
Most used alternative
Spring Boot · 4,174
Fastest hiring, 90 days
Spring Boot
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

backend frameworks companies choose instead of Quarkus

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs Quarkuspostings, 90 dCompare
1
Spring BootBroadcom
4,1741485%20,078Quarkus vs Spring Boot →
2
ASP.NETMicrosoft
3,3381188%7,555Quarkus vs ASP.NET →
3
3,3051176%8,205Quarkus vs FastAPI →
4
3,1221111%10,955Quarkus vs Spring Framework →
5
DjangoDjango Software Foundation
2,758981%5,572Quarkus vs Django →
6
LaravelLaravel
2,091744%4,341Quarkus vs Laravel →
7
Express.jsOpenJS Foundation
1,937689%3,426Quarkus vs Express.js →
8
FlaskPallets
1,848658%4,223Quarkus vs Flask →
9
HibernateRed Hat
1,843656%4,637Quarkus vs Hibernate →
10
1,274453%2,490Quarkus vs Entity Framework →
11
Ruby on RailsRails Core Team
1,273453%3,319Quarkus vs Ruby on Rails →
12
NestJSNestJS
1,247444%2,073Quarkus vs NestJS →
13
SymfonySensioLabs
882314%1,649Quarkus vs Symfony →
14
Jakarta PersistenceEclipse Foundation
871310%1,922Quarkus vs Jakarta Persistence →
15
JavaServer PagesEclipse Foundation
587209%970Quarkus vs JavaServer Pages →
16
JDBCOracle
580206%1,352Quarkus vs JDBC →
17
PrismaPrisma
560199%1,358Quarkus vs Prisma →
18
Spring MVCVMware (Broadcom)
529188%1,106Quarkus vs Spring MVC →
19
526187%938Quarkus vs Windows Communication Foundation →
20
521185%1,033Quarkus vs Entity Framework Core →
21
Classic ASPMicrosoft
473168%847Quarkus vs Classic ASP →
22
Spring SecurityVMware (Broadcom)
449160%1,134Quarkus vs Spring Security →
23
CodeIgniterCodeIgniter Foundation
418149%527Quarkus vs CodeIgniter →
24
SQLAlchemySQLAlchemy
404144%627Quarkus vs SQLAlchemy →
25
363129%571Quarkus vs Java Servlet →
26
Spring CloudBroadcom (VMware Tanzu)
356127%1,021Quarkus vs Spring Cloud →
27
Apache StrutsApache Software Foundation
329117%550Quarkus vs Apache Struts →
28
Jakarta Server FacesEclipse Foundation
27397%568Quarkus vs Jakarta Server Faces →
29
25791%436Quarkus vs Django REST Framework →
30
Spring DataBroadcom (VMware Tanzu)
25791%657Quarkus vs Spring Data →
31
24186%331Quarkus vs Enterprise JavaBeans →
32
RazorMicrosoft
23885%434Quarkus vs Razor →
33
PhoenixPhoenix framework
22881%704Quarkus vs Phoenix →
34
ADO.NETMicrosoft
22078%321Quarkus vs ADO.NET →
35
FastifyFastify
19971%500Quarkus vs Fastify →
36
19770%238Quarkus vs ASP.NET Web Forms →
37
Zend FrameworkLaminas Project
18967%612Quarkus vs Zend Framework →
38
18666%293Quarkus vs ASP.NET Web API →
39
Spring BatchBroadcom (VMware Tanzu)
18666%500Quarkus vs Spring Batch →
39,010 companies name a backend framework in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on Quarkus users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 backend frameworks are named by companies instead of Quarkus: Spring Boot by 4,174 companies, ASP.NET by 3,338, FastAPI by 3,305, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/quarkus/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

Quarkus alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to Quarkus?

Spring Boot: 4,174 companies name it in their own job postings, against 281 for Quarkus.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on Quarkus
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market