Solidity alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 programming languages are named by companies instead of Solidity: Python by 34,668 companies, Java by 15,900, C# by 11,531.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Solidity, companies in postings
- 275
- Most used alternative
- Python · 34,668
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Python
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
Programming languages companies choose instead of Solidity
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Solidity | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PythonPSF | 34,668 | 12607% | 248,462 | Solidity vs Python → | |
| 2 | JavaOracle | 15,900 | 5782% | 97,842 | Solidity vs Java → | |
| 3 | C#Microsoft | 11,531 | 4193% | 45,032 | Solidity vs C# → | |
| 4 | C++ISO C++ Committee | 9,805 | 3565% | 60,903 | Solidity vs C++ → | |
| 5 | PHPThe PHP Group | 7,302 | 2655% | 15,984 | Solidity vs PHP → | |
| 6 | GoGoogle | 7,047 | 2563% | 29,064 | Solidity vs Go → | |
| 7 | RR Foundation | 7,002 | 2546% | 22,786 | Solidity vs R → | |
| 8 | CISO C Committee | 4,350 | 1582% | 19,202 | Solidity vs C → | |
| 9 | KotlinJetBrains | 3,247 | 1181% | 10,155 | Solidity vs Kotlin → | |
| 10 | RustRust Foundation | 2,950 | 1073% | 11,599 | Solidity vs Rust → | |
| 11 | SwiftApple | 2,840 | 1033% | 8,346 | Solidity vs Swift → | |
| 12 | ScalaEPFL | 2,062 | 750% | 7,445 | Solidity vs Scala → | |
| 13 | RubyRuby Association | 1,922 | 699% | 6,272 | Solidity vs Ruby → | |
| 14 | PerlThe Perl Foundation | 1,808 | 657% | 9,475 | Solidity vs Perl → | |
| 15 | Salesforce ApexSalesforce | 1,733 | 630% | 5,354 | Solidity vs Salesforce Apex → | |
| 16 | ABAPSAP | 1,491 | 542% | 7,056 | Solidity vs ABAP → | |
| 17 | Visual BasicMicrosoft | 1,350 | 491% | 3,144 | Solidity vs Visual Basic → | |
| 18 | Apache GroovyApache Software Foundation | 1,011 | 368% | 2,540 | Solidity vs Apache Groovy → | |
| 19 | Objective-CApple | 878 | 319% | 1,614 | Solidity vs Objective-C → | |
| 20 | VB.NETMicrosoft | 838 | 305% | 1,542 | Solidity vs VB.NET → | |
| 21 | DartGoogle | 781 | 284% | 1,105 | Solidity vs Dart → | |
| 22 | COBOLCODASYL | 522 | 190% | 1,840 | Solidity vs COBOL → | |
| 23 | DelphiEmbarcadero | 429 | 156% | 1,366 | Solidity vs Delphi → | |
| 24 | FortranFortran Standards Committee | 324 | 118% | 1,090 | Solidity vs Fortran → | |
| 25 | LuaPUC-Rio | 275 | 100% | 668 | Solidity vs Lua → | |
| 26 | 272 | 99% | 742 | Solidity vs Assembly Language → | ||
| 27 | JuliaJulia Project | 254 | 92% | 565 | Solidity vs Julia → | |
| 28 | ElixirElixir Core Team | 214 | 78% | 433 | Solidity vs Elixir → | |
| 29 | RPG (IBM i)IBM | 204 | 74% | 361 | Solidity vs RPG (IBM i) → | |
| 30 | AdaAda Core / ISO | 177 | 64% | 831 | Solidity vs Ada → | |
| 31 | AL (Business Central)Microsoft | 152 | 55% | 290 | Solidity vs AL (Business Central) → | |
| 32 | REXXIBM | 140 | 51% | 384 | Solidity vs REXX → | |
| 33 | X++Microsoft | 134 | 49% | 243 | Solidity vs X++ → | |
| 34 | HLSLMicrosoft | 109 | 40% | 197 | soon | |
| 35 | HaskellHaskell.org | 104 | 38% | 233 | soon | |
| 36 | ClojureClojure | 96 | 35% | 161 | soon | |
| 37 | 83 | 30% | 189 | soon | ||
| 38 | ErlangEricsson | 77 | 28% | 138 | soon | |
| 39 | F#Microsoft | 74 | 27% | 132 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Solidity users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 programming languages are named by companies instead of Solidity: Python by 34,668 companies, Java by 15,900, C# by 11,531, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/solidity/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Solidity alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Solidity?
Python: 34,668 companies name it in their own job postings, against 275 for Solidity.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Solidity
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.