Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · api specs data formats · Alternatives

tRPC alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of tRPC: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

tRPC, companies in postings
106
Most used alternative
JSON · 6,396
Fastest hiring, 90 days
JSON
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

api specs data formats companies choose instead of tRPC

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs tRPCpostings, 90 dCompare
1
JSONEcma International
6,3966034%19,737soon
2
XMLW3C
5,2644966%12,841soon
3
Model Context ProtocolAnthropic
4,8924615%16,002soon
4
GraphQLGraphQL Foundation
4,0893858%12,076soon
5
SOAPW3C
3,6613454%10,243soon
6
gRPCCloud Native Computing Foundation
1,7531654%4,571soon
7
OpenAPIOpenAPI Initiative
1,4321351%3,245soon
8
YAMLYAML Language Development Team
1,029971%2,569soon
9
Microsoft GraphMicrosoft
942889%2,115soon
10
ODataOASIS
844796%3,073soon
11
XSLTW3C
820774%1,501soon
12
CSVIETF
782738%1,180soon
13
SAP IDocSAP
722681%2,746soon
14
Apache ParquetApache Software Foundation
690651%1,246soon
15
Protocol BuffersGoogle
566534%1,102soon
16
Agent2Agent (A2A) ProtocolLinux Foundation
443418%1,572soon
17
PDFAdobe
405382%839soon
18
ANSI X12ASC X12
371350%761soon
19
Markdown
337318%585soon
20
XML Schema (XSD)W3C
291275%551soon
21
Apache AvroApache Software Foundation
280264%560soon
22
ISO 20022ISO
272257%763soon
23
WSDLW3C
256242%511soon
24
UN/EDIFACTUnited Nations
253239%406soon
25
RDFW3C
221208%813soon
26
Web Ontology LanguageW3C
216204%703soon
27
JSON SchemaJSON Schema organization
169159%301soon
28
H.264ITU-T / ISO
160151%327soon
29
XBRLXBRL International
152143%294soon
30
RedfishDMTF
137129%661soon
31
H.265ITU-T
126119%244soon
32
RSSRSS Advisory Board
122115%321soon
33
Apache ORCApache Software Foundation
118111%235soon
34
RAMLMuleSoft
10599%187soon
35
Schema.orgSchema.org
10397%148soon
36
JSON-LDW3C
9993%146soon
37
DITAOASIS
9691%197soon
38
YANGIETF
8984%286soon
39
OpenUSDAlliance for OpenUSD
8883%291soon
38,897 companies name a api specs data format in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on tRPC users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Get the full list Watch this category

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of tRPC: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/trpc/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

tRPC alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to tRPC?

JSON: 6,396 companies name it in their own job postings, against 106 for tRPC.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on tRPC
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

Start free
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market