Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · iot platforms protocols · Alternatives

UDS (ISO 14229) alternatives

As of 5 November 2026, 39 iot platforms protocols are named by companies instead of UDS (ISO 14229): Modbus by 2,078 companies, CAN bus by 1,775, SPI by 1,569.

As of 5 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

UDS (ISO 14229), companies in postings
175
Most used alternative
Modbus · 2,078
Fastest hiring, 90 days
Modbus
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

iot platforms protocols companies choose instead of UDS (ISO 14229)

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs UDS (ISO 14229)postings, 90 dCompare
1
ModbusModbus Organization
2,0781187%5,703UDS (ISO 14229) vs Modbus →
2
1,7751014%5,652UDS (ISO 14229) vs CAN bus →
3
SPIMotorola
1,569897%4,978UDS (ISO 14229) vs SPI →
4
I2CNXP
1,523870%4,848UDS (ISO 14229) vs I2C →
5
UART(industry standard)
1,249714%3,232UDS (ISO 14229) vs UART →
6
MQTTOASIS
1,209691%2,662UDS (ISO 14229) vs MQTT →
7
1,056603%2,396UDS (ISO 14229) vs EtherNet/IP →
8
OPC UAOPC Foundation
940537%2,107UDS (ISO 14229) vs OPC UA →
9
PROFINETPROFIBUS & PROFINET International
917524%2,035UDS (ISO 14229) vs PROFINET →
10
PROFIBUSPROFIBUS & PROFINET International
704402%1,644UDS (ISO 14229) vs PROFIBUS →
11
BACnetASHRAE
600343%1,759UDS (ISO 14229) vs BACnet →
12
USBUSB Implementers Forum
597341%1,792UDS (ISO 14229) vs USB →
13
476272%949UDS (ISO 14229) vs Bluetooth Low Energy →
14
467267%998UDS (ISO 14229) vs RS-485 →
15
OPC (OPC UA)OPC Foundation
455260%1,194UDS (ISO 14229) vs OPC (OPC UA) →
16
450257%1,039UDS (ISO 14229) vs RS-232 →
17
KNXKNX Association
402230%708UDS (ISO 14229) vs KNX →
18
EtherCATEtherCAT Technology Group
379217%889UDS (ISO 14229) vs EtherCAT →
19
BluetoothBluetooth SIG
348199%657UDS (ISO 14229) vs Bluetooth →
20
327187%1,116UDS (ISO 14229) vs IEC 61850 →
21
DNP3IEEE
323185%896UDS (ISO 14229) vs DNP3 →
22
288165%607UDS (ISO 14229) vs DeviceNet →
23
DDS (Data Distribution Service)Object Management Group
285163%666UDS (ISO 14229) vs DDS (Data Distribution Service) →
24
LIN BusLIN Consortium
269154%1,217UDS (ISO 14229) vs LIN Bus →
25
CAN FDBosch
183105%542UDS (ISO 14229) vs CAN FD →
26
SAE J1939SAE International
182104%467UDS (ISO 14229) vs SAE J1939 →
27
ZigbeeConnectivity Standards Alliance
182104%430UDS (ISO 14229) vs Zigbee →
28
RS-422TIA/EIA
181103%615UDS (ISO 14229) vs RS-422 →
29
17097%379UDS (ISO 14229) vs GPIO →
30
CANopenCAN in Automation
16293%294UDS (ISO 14229) vs CANopen →
31
NFCNFC Forum
14885%362UDS (ISO 14229) vs NFC →
32
DMX512USITT
12370%151soon
33
LonWorksEchelon
11666%407soon
34
ARINCSAE ITT
11465%503soon
35
EcoStruxureSchneider Electric
10962%338soon
36
LoRaWANLoRa Alliance
10962%186soon
37
Azure IoT HubMicrosoft
10258%160soon
38
IO-LinkIO-Link Community
10057%185soon
39
DALIDiiA
9957%154soon
20,941 companies name a iot platforms protocol in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on UDS (ISO 14229) users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 iot platforms protocols are named by companies instead of UDS (ISO 14229): Modbus by 2,078 companies, CAN bus by 1,775, SPI by 1,569, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 5 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/uds-iso-14229/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

UDS (ISO 14229) alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to UDS (ISO 14229)?

Modbus: 2,078 companies name it in their own job postings, against 175 for UDS (ISO 14229).

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on UDS (ISO 14229)
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market