Adobe Target VS Hotjar
As of 30 October 2026, Hotjar is named by 304 companies and Adobe Target by 106; Adobe Target skews to companies under 200 people (19% vs 60%), Hotjar to companies over 1,000 (15% vs 64%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Adobe Target's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Hotjar rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Adobe Target: 2–200 employees
- 19%
- Hotjar: 2–200 employees
- 60%
- Adobe Target: 1,000+ employees
- 64%
- Hotjar: 1,000+ employees
- 15%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 1.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 223,072
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Adobe Target | share | Hotjar | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 6 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 1 | 1% | 19 | 6% | Hotjar |
| 11-50 employees | 6 | 6% | 79 | 26% | Hotjar |
| 51-200 employees | 13 | 12% | 84 | 28% | Hotjar |
| 201-500 employees | 12 | 11% | 42 | 14% | Hotjar |
| 501-1000 employees | 5 | 5% | 27 | 9% | Hotjar |
| 1001-5000 employees | 24 | 23% | 25 | 8% | Adobe Target |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 10% | 7 | 2% | Adobe Target |
| 10,001+ employees | 33 | 31% | 15 | 5% | Adobe Target |
| Segment | Adobe Target | share | Hotjar | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 38 | 36% | 90 | 30% | Adobe Target |
| Technology & software | 35 | 33% | 113 | 37% | Hotjar |
| Health care | 6 | 6% | 8 | 3% | Adobe Target |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 4% | 29 | 10% | Hotjar |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 4% | 14 | 5% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 4 | 4% | 4 | 1% | Adobe Target |
| Manufacturing & industry | 4 | 4% | 13 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 3% | 14 | 5% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 3% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Adobe Target | share | Hotjar | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 75 | 71% | 128 | 42% | Adobe Target |
| Canada | 6 | 6% | 7 | 2% | Adobe Target |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% | 21 | 7% | even |
| Singapore | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 2 | 2% | 20 | 7% | Hotjar |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 2 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 1 | 1% | 8 | 3% | even |
| France | 1 | 1% | 20 | 7% | Hotjar |
| Poland | – | – | 15 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 12 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 10 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Adobe Target | share | Hotjar | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing & communications | 84 | 21% | 276 | 34% | Hotjar |
| Software engineering | 83 | 21% | 96 | 12% | Adobe Target |
| IT operations & business systems | 31 | 8% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 27 | 7% | 49 | 6% | even |
| Data & AI | 19 | 5% | 13 | 2% | Adobe Target |
| Customer service & success | 8 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 7 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 3 | 1% | 131 | 16% | Hotjar |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 15 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | – | – | 12 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Adobe Target →
Companies using Hotjar →
product analytics experimentation ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Hotjar is named by 304 companies in job postings and Adobe Target by 106; 14 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/adobe-target-vs-hotjar)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Adobe Target vs Hotjar: questions
Which is more used, Adobe Target or Hotjar?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Hotjar (304) over Adobe Target (106). By website-and-DNS footprint, Hotjar (223,072 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Adobe Target?
19% of Adobe Target companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 60% for Hotjar. 64% of Adobe Target companies have over 1,000 employees, against 15% for Hotjar.
Do companies run both?
14 companies name both in their postings, usually Adobe Target in marketing and Hotjar in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Adobe Target or Hotjar. Start free, no card.