Tools · Category

product analytics experimentation, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, Amplitude leads product analytics experimentation with 952 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Mixpanel at 867.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
Amplitude · 952
Runner-up
Mixpanel · 867
Most hiring, 90 days
Amplitude
Highest postings per company
Hotjar
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
4,438companies across the category
21%of them on Amplitude
7,646postings naming a product analytics experimentation in 90 days
21tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every product analytics experimentation we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
AmplitudeAmplitude
952
1,4991.6
2
MixpanelMixpanel
867
1,3361.5
3
HotjarContentsquare
406
1,1602.9
4
OptimizelyOptimizely
380
6601.7
5
PostHogPostHog
338
4581.4
6
PendoPendo
210
3481.7
7
VWOWingify
189
3081.6
8
171
2671.6
9
152
3522.3
10
ContentsquareContentsquare
132
2371.8
11
LaunchDarklyLaunchDarkly
121
2492.1
12
HeapContentsquare
110
1241.1
13
FullstoryFullstory
101
1571.6
14
StatsigStatsig
95
1681.8
15
AB TastyAB Tasty
56
691.2
16
GrowthBookGrowthBook
50
641.3
17
KameleoonKameleoon
27
371.4
18
Quantum MetricQuantum Metric
24
461.9
19
Dynamic YieldMastercard
23
381.7
20
EppoDatadog
21
422.0
21
SuperwallSuperwall
13
272.1
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Amplitude leads product analytics experimentation with 952 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Mixpanel at 867. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/product-analytics-experimentation)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

product analytics experimentation: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free