Altera FPGAs VS Xilinx
As of 30 October 2026, Xilinx is named by 269 companies and Altera FPGAs by 125; Altera FPGAs skews to companies under 200 people (40% vs 50%), Xilinx to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 41%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Altera FPGAs's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Xilinx rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Altera FPGAs: 2–200 employees
- 40%
- Xilinx: 2–200 employees
- 50%
- Altera FPGAs: 1,000+ employees
- 41%
- Xilinx: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.0 · 4.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Altera FPGAs | share | Xilinx | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 15 | 12% | 23 | 9% | Altera FPGAs |
| 11-50 employees | 15 | 12% | 49 | 18% | Xilinx |
| 51-200 employees | 20 | 16% | 62 | 23% | Xilinx |
| 201-500 employees | 14 | 11% | 39 | 14% | Xilinx |
| 501-1000 employees | 10 | 8% | 15 | 6% | Altera FPGAs |
| 1001-5000 employees | 18 | 14% | 30 | 11% | Altera FPGAs |
| 5001-10000 employees | 13 | 10% | 12 | 4% | Altera FPGAs |
| 10,001+ employees | 20 | 16% | 37 | 14% | Altera FPGAs |
| Self-employed | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Altera FPGAs | share | Xilinx | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 63 | 50% | 160 | 59% | Xilinx |
| Technology & software | 22 | 18% | 47 | 17% | even |
| Business & finance services | 21 | 17% | 35 | 13% | Altera FPGAs |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 4% | 10 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 3% | 3 | 1% | Altera FPGAs |
| Health care | 3 | 2% | 1 | 0% | Altera FPGAs |
| Property & construction | 3 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Altera FPGAs | share | Xilinx | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 75 | 60% | 172 | 64% | Xilinx |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 10% | 16 | 6% | Altera FPGAs |
| Germany | 7 | 6% | 16 | 6% | even |
| France | 6 | 5% | 11 | 4% | even |
| Spain | 3 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Finland | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 2 | 2% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Norway | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 2 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Altera FPGAs | share | Xilinx | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 422 | 69% | 806 | 58% | Altera FPGAs |
| Software engineering | 69 | 11% | 329 | 24% | Xilinx |
| Sales | 14 | 2% | 16 | 1% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 12 | 2% | 24 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 10 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 4 | 1% | 23 | 2% | even |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 34 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Altera FPGAs →
Companies using Xilinx →
compute processors ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Xilinx is named by 269 companies in job postings and Altera FPGAs by 125; 155 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/altera-vs-xilinx)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Altera FPGAs vs Xilinx: questions
Which is more used, Altera FPGAs or Xilinx?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Xilinx (269) over Altera FPGAs (125). By website-and-DNS footprint, Xilinx (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Altera FPGAs?
40% of Altera FPGAs companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 50% for Xilinx. 41% of Altera FPGAs companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for Xilinx.
Do companies run both?
155 companies name both in their postings, usually Altera FPGAs in marketing and Xilinx in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Altera FPGAs or Xilinx. Start free, no card.