Start free
Tools · Category

compute processors, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, Arm architecture leads compute processors with 1,820 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of NVIDIA at 619.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
Arm architecture · 1,820
Runner-up
NVIDIA · 619
Most hiring, 90 days
Arm architecture
Highest postings per company
HBM
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
7,258companies across the category
25%of them on Arm architecture
37,300postings naming a compute processor in 90 days
40tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every compute processor we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
Arm architectureArm Holdings
1,820
6,1093.4
2
NVIDIANVIDIA
619
6,0339.7
3
PCI ExpressPCI-SIG
597
5,3829.0
4
XilinxAMD
363
1,3723.8
5
InfiniBandInfiniBand Trade Association
304
1,9536.4
6
Cisco UCSCisco
211
4021.9
7
MIPIMIPI Alliance
205
6563.2
8
MicrochipMicrochip Technology
178
4872.7
9
RISC-VRISC-V International
168
1,2937.7
10
Altera FPGAsAltera
167
6033.6
11
Arm CortexArm
165
3111.9
12
NVIDIA GPUNVIDIA
164
1,2517.6
13
ZynqAMD
158
3031.9
14
x86
139
6654.8
15
NVLinkNVIDIA
118
8377.1
16
Xilinx UltraScaleAMD
118
3152.7
17
MIPSMIPS Technologies
112
3483.1
18
ARM64 (AArch64)Arm
111
2702.4
19
DDR4JEDEC
110
5384.9
20
Dell iDRACDell Technologies
109
2352.2
21
Google TPUGoogle
105
3703.5
22
QualcommQualcomm
102
2152.1
23
HBMJEDEC
96
1,36614.2
24
LVDSTIA/EIA
92
2312.5
25
NVIDIA DGXNVIDIA
79
6798.6
26
Xilinx FPGAAMD
74
2323.1
27
Compute Express LinkCXL Consortium
72
99213.8
28
DDR5JEDEC
70
5307.6
29
VersalAMD
70
3304.7
30
NVIDIA H100NVIDIA
66
1632.5
31
Dell PowerEdgeDell
62
2113.4
32
HPE ProLiantHewlett Packard Enterprise
62
1382.2
33
LPDDRJEDEC
58
74512.8
34
UCIeUCIe Consortium
57
5199.1
35
PowerPCIBM
51
1843.6
36
SupermicroSuper Micro Computer
49
58411.9
37
NVIDIA H200NVIDIA
43
1373.2
38
AtmelMicrochip
40
501.3
39
NVIDIA HGXNVIDIA
38
1915.0
40
StratixIntel
36
701.9
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Arm architecture vs NVIDIA1,820 · 619Arm architecture vs PCI Express1,820 · 597Arm architecture vs Xilinx1,820 · 363Arm architecture vs InfiniBand1,820 · 304Arm architecture vs Cisco UCS1,820 · 211NVIDIA vs PCI Express619 · 597NVIDIA vs Xilinx619 · 363NVIDIA vs InfiniBand619 · 304NVIDIA vs Cisco UCS619 · 211PCI Express vs Xilinx597 · 363PCI Express vs InfiniBand597 · 304PCI Express vs Cisco UCS597 · 211Xilinx vs InfiniBand363 · 304Xilinx vs Cisco UCS363 · 211InfiniBand vs Cisco UCS304 · 211
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Arm architecture leads compute processors with 1,820 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of NVIDIA at 619. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/compute-processors)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

compute processors: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

Start free with 1,000 records
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free