Arm architecture VS Xilinx
As of 5 November 2026, Xilinx is named by 362 companies and Arm architecture by 1,829; Arm architecture skews to companies under 200 people (41% vs 49%), Xilinx to companies over 1,000 (30% vs 36%).
As of 5 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Arm architecture's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Xilinx rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Arm architecture: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- Xilinx: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- Arm architecture: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Xilinx: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.4 · 3.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Arm architecture | share | Xilinx | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 32 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 158 | 9% | 37 | 10% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 253 | 14% | 60 | 17% | Xilinx |
| 51-200 employees | 338 | 18% | 81 | 22% | Xilinx |
| 201-500 employees | 254 | 14% | 50 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 142 | 8% | 20 | 6% | Arm architecture |
| 1001-5000 employees | 302 | 17% | 43 | 12% | Arm architecture |
| 5001-10000 employees | 108 | 6% | 16 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 242 | 13% | 49 | 14% | even |
| Segment | Arm architecture | share | Xilinx | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 569 | 31% | 66 | 18% | Arm architecture |
| Manufacturing & industry | 565 | 31% | 203 | 56% | Xilinx |
| Business & finance services | 307 | 17% | 49 | 14% | Arm architecture |
| Property & construction | 54 | 3% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 53 | 3% | 15 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 52 | 3% | 3 | 1% | Arm architecture |
| Public, community & associations | 45 | 2% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 44 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 43 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 34 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 32 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 22 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Arm architecture | share | Xilinx | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,105 | 60% | 232 | 64% | Xilinx |
| United Kingdom | 111 | 6% | 19 | 5% | even |
| Germany | 87 | 5% | 20 | 6% | even |
| India | 59 | 3% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 45 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| France | 43 | 2% | 13 | 4% | even |
| Netherlands | 32 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 29 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 22 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 18 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 17 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 16 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Austria | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Arm architecture | share | Xilinx | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 3,204 | 39% | 394 | 24% | Arm architecture |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1,450 | 18% | 977 | 59% | Xilinx |
| IT operations & business systems | 1,135 | 14% | 22 | 1% | Arm architecture |
| Data & AI | 269 | 3% | 6 | 0% | Arm architecture |
| Sales | 216 | 3% | 18 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 212 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 174 | 2% | 1 | 0% | Arm architecture |
| Finance & accounting | 149 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 98 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 42 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Real estate and property | 40 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 32 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 28 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 18 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | 16 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 16 | 0% | 38 | 2% | Xilinx |
| Design & UX | 15 | 0% | 23 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 14 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 13 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 12 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture and environment | 11 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 8 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 5 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Social care and community | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Arm architecture →
Companies using Xilinx →
compute processors ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Xilinx is named by 362 companies in job postings and Arm architecture by 1,829; 95 name both. (Breaknorm, 5 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/arm-architecture-vs-xilinx)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Arm architecture vs Xilinx: questions
Which is more used, Arm architecture or Xilinx?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Arm architecture (1,829) over Xilinx (362). By website-and-DNS footprint, Xilinx (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Arm architecture?
41% of Arm architecture companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 49% for Xilinx. 36% of Arm architecture companies have over 1,000 employees, against 30% for Xilinx.
Do companies run both?
95 companies name both in their postings, usually Arm architecture in marketing and Xilinx in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Arm architecture or Xilinx. Start free, no card.