Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · data warehouses olap

Amazon Redshift VS Databricks SQL

As of 30 October 2026, Databricks SQL is named by 121 companies and Amazon Redshift by 1,665; Amazon Redshift skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 29%), Databricks SQL to companies over 1,000 (43% vs 29%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon Redshift's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Databricks SQL rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Amazon Redshift: 2–200 employees
46%
Databricks SQL: 2–200 employees
29%
Amazon Redshift: 1,000+ employees
29%
Databricks SQL: 1,000+ employees
43%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.5 · 2.6
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
1,665companies name Amazon Redshift
121companies name Databricks SQL
0name both
4,233 · 320postings in 90 days, Amazon Redshift · Databricks SQL
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAmazon RedshiftshareDatabricks SQLshareLeans
Self-employed151%22%even
2-10 employees1137%32%Amazon Redshift
11-50 employees23814%97%Amazon Redshift
51-200 employees42225%2319%Amazon Redshift
201-500 employees23614%2017%Databricks SQL
501-1000 employees16010%1210%even
1001-5000 employees25215%2218%Databricks SQL
5001-10000 employees694%76%even
10,001+ employees16010%2319%Databricks SQL
By industry
SegmentAmazon RedshiftshareDatabricks SQLshareLeans
Technology & software87052%4840%Amazon Redshift
Business & finance services34521%3831%Databricks SQL
Manufacturing & industry1066%119%Databricks SQL
Media & content986%22%Amazon Redshift
Consumer services & leisure473%43%even
Utilities & infrastructure443%32%even
Commerce & trade342%32%even
Health care282%43%even
Public, community & associations262%32%even
Property & construction211%11%even
Transport, logistics & rental181%22%even
Hospitality & travel151%22%even
By country
SegmentAmazon RedshiftshareDatabricks SQLshareLeans
United States1,16370%8469%even
United Kingdom1207%43%Amazon Redshift
India513%22%even
Canada382%65%Databricks SQL
Germany382%22%even
France342%22%even
Australia221%32%even
Singapore151%––outside top 12
Brazil141%11%even
Japan131%––outside top 12
Poland111%––outside top 12
Spain101%11%even
United Arab Emirates––22%outside top 12
Switzerland––22%outside top 12
Belgium––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAmazon RedshiftshareDatabricks SQLshareLeans
Data & AI3,78364%28477%Databricks SQL
Software engineering77613%205%Amazon Redshift
IT operations & business systems3266%123%Amazon Redshift
Product, program & project management1072%195%Databricks SQL
Sales992%10%even
Design & UX902%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications481%21%even
Finance & accounting361%10%even
Engineering (non-software)240%10%even
Customer service & success220%––outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport140%––outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk130%––outside top 12
Construction and civil––21%outside top 12
Human resources––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Databricks SQL is named by 121 companies in job postings and Amazon Redshift by 1,665; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-redshift-vs-databricks-sql)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Amazon Redshift vs Databricks SQL: questions

Which is more used, Amazon Redshift or Databricks SQL?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Amazon Redshift (1,665) over Databricks SQL (121). By website-and-DNS footprint, Databricks SQL (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Amazon Redshift?

46% of Amazon Redshift companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 29% for Databricks SQL. 29% of Amazon Redshift companies have over 1,000 employees, against 43% for Databricks SQL.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon Redshift in marketing and Databricks SQL in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Amazon Redshift or Databricks SQL. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market