Tools · Category

data warehouses olap, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, Snowflake leads data warehouses olap with 5,634 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Google BigQuery at 3,662.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
Snowflake · 5,634
Runner-up
Google BigQuery · 3,662
Most hiring, 90 days
Snowflake
Highest postings per company
Snowflake
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
18,498companies across the category
30%of them on Snowflake
57,544postings naming a data warehouses olap in 90 days
22tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every data warehouses olap we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
SnowflakeSnowflake
5,634
22,5814.0
2
3,662
10,3412.8
3
Amazon RedshiftAmazon Web Services
2,257
5,1472.3
4
1,370
3,5782.6
5
Amazon AthenaAmazon Web Services
1,159
3,0752.7
6
ClickHouseClickHouse
894
2,0262.3
7
851
2,7513.2
8
490
1,2842.6
9
TeradataTeradata
326
1,0993.4
10
293
1,0023.4
11
285
1,0693.8
12
251
9073.6
13
200
7563.8
14
DuckDBDuckDB Foundation
186
3131.7
15
Databricks SQLDatabricks
159
4062.6
16
Apache DruidApache Software Foundation
124
2311.9
17
72
2143.0
18
VerticaOpenText
70
1612.3
19
65
2604.0
20
StarRocksStarRocks
55
1031.9
21
Apache PinotApache Software Foundation
49
1493.0
22
GreenplumVMware Tanzu
46
912.0
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Snowflake leads data warehouses olap with 5,634 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Google BigQuery at 3,662. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/data-warehouses-olap)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

data warehouses olap: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free