Amazon Redshift VS Google BigQuery_
As of 4 November 2026, Google BigQuery is named by 3,662 companies and Amazon Redshift by 2,257; Amazon Redshift skews to companies under 200 people (45% vs 46%), Google BigQuery to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 29%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon Redshift's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Google BigQuery rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Amazon Redshift: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- Google BigQuery: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- Amazon Redshift: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Google BigQuery: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Amazon Redshift | share | Google BigQuery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 65 | 3% | 129 | 4% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 184 | 8% | 332 | 9% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 299 | 13% | 549 | 15% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 530 | 23% | 821 | 22% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 307 | 14% | 496 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 216 | 10% | 347 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 343 | 15% | 497 | 14% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 89 | 4% | 141 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 224 | 10% | 350 | 10% | even |
| Segment | Amazon Redshift | share | Google BigQuery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 1,112 | 49% | 1,627 | 44% | Amazon Redshift |
| Business & finance services | 522 | 23% | 809 | 22% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 132 | 6% | 208 | 6% | even |
| Media & content | 128 | 6% | 229 | 6% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 75 | 3% | 127 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 61 | 3% | 234 | 6% | Google BigQuery |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 54 | 2% | 75 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 41 | 2% | 79 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 37 | 2% | 64 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 27 | 1% | 54 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 27 | 1% | 55 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 22 | 1% | 59 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Amazon Redshift | share | Google BigQuery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,475 | 65% | 2,096 | 57% | Amazon Redshift |
| United Kingdom | 162 | 7% | 293 | 8% | even |
| India | 65 | 3% | 81 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 52 | 2% | 151 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 50 | 2% | 73 | 2% | even |
| France | 44 | 2% | 136 | 4% | even |
| Brazil | 28 | 1% | 86 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 27 | 1% | 53 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 19 | 1% | 53 | 1% | even |
| Japan | 18 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 17 | 1% | 60 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 16 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 46 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 37 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon Redshift | share | Google BigQuery | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 4,462 | 64% | 6,990 | 52% | Amazon Redshift |
| Software engineering | 890 | 13% | 1,985 | 15% | Google BigQuery |
| IT operations & business systems | 375 | 5% | 754 | 6% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 139 | 2% | 308 | 2% | even |
| Design & UX | 123 | 2% | 9 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 119 | 2% | 360 | 3% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 61 | 1% | 513 | 4% | Google BigQuery |
| Finance & accounting | 48 | 1% | 219 | 2% | even |
| Customer service & success | 30 | 0% | 105 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 27 | 0% | 99 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 18 | 0% | 54 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 17 | 0% | 54 | 0% | even |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 15 | 0% | 148 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 13 | 0% | 55 | 0% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 10 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 8 | 0% | 22 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 7 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 7 | 0% | 15 | 0% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 6 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 6 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 3 | 0% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | 9 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| healthcare support and caregiving | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 9 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| real estate and property | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Travel, leisure & events | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Amazon Redshift →
Companies using Google BigQuery →
data warehouses olap ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Google BigQuery is named by 3,662 companies in job postings and Amazon Redshift by 2,257; 1,398 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-redshift-vs-google-bigquery)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Amazon Redshift vs Google BigQuery: questions
Which is more used, Amazon Redshift or Google BigQuery?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Google BigQuery (3,662) over Amazon Redshift (2,257). By website-and-DNS footprint, Google BigQuery (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Amazon Redshift?
45% of Amazon Redshift companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 46% for Google BigQuery. 29% of Amazon Redshift companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for Google BigQuery.
Do companies run both?
1,398 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon Redshift in marketing and Google BigQuery in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Amazon Redshift or Google BigQuery, and get 1,000 records free.