Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · data warehouses olap

Amazon Redshift VS DuckDB

As of 30 October 2026, DuckDB is named by 135 companies and Amazon Redshift by 1,665; Amazon Redshift skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 57%), DuckDB to companies over 1,000 (19% vs 29%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon Redshift's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, DuckDB rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Amazon Redshift: 2–200 employees
46%
DuckDB: 2–200 employees
57%
Amazon Redshift: 1,000+ employees
29%
DuckDB: 1,000+ employees
19%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.5 · 1.8
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
1,665companies name Amazon Redshift
135companies name DuckDB
0name both
4,233 · 245postings in 90 days, Amazon Redshift · DuckDB
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAmazon RedshiftshareDuckDBshareLeans
Self-employed151%11%even
2-10 employees1137%2317%DuckDB
11-50 employees23814%2418%DuckDB
51-200 employees42225%3022%Amazon Redshift
201-500 employees23614%1713%even
501-1000 employees16010%1410%even
1001-5000 employees25215%1511%Amazon Redshift
5001-10000 employees694%21%Amazon Redshift
10,001+ employees16010%97%Amazon Redshift
By industry
SegmentAmazon RedshiftshareDuckDBshareLeans
Technology & software87052%7959%DuckDB
Business & finance services34521%2116%Amazon Redshift
Manufacturing & industry1066%64%even
Media & content986%32%Amazon Redshift
Consumer services & leisure473%75%DuckDB
Utilities & infrastructure443%43%even
Commerce & trade342%11%even
Health care282%43%even
Public, community & associations262%86%DuckDB
Property & construction211%––outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental181%––outside top 12
Hospitality & travel151%––outside top 12
Agriculture & forestry––11%outside top 12
Automotive––11%outside top 12
By country
SegmentAmazon RedshiftshareDuckDBshareLeans
United States1,16370%9369%even
United Kingdom1207%1310%DuckDB
India513%21%even
Canada382%11%even
Germany382%86%DuckDB
France342%21%even
Australia221%11%even
Singapore151%––outside top 12
Brazil141%11%even
Japan131%––outside top 12
Poland111%21%even
Spain101%––outside top 12
Switzerland––21%outside top 12
Netherlands––21%outside top 12
Belgium––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAmazon RedshiftshareDuckDBshareLeans
Data & AI3,78364%16751%Amazon Redshift
Software engineering77613%11435%DuckDB
IT operations & business systems3266%52%Amazon Redshift
Product, program & project management1072%10%even
Sales992%31%even
Design & UX902%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications481%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting361%10%even
Engineering (non-software)240%10%even
Customer service & success220%10%even
Logistics warehouse and transport140%––outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk130%––outside top 12
Construction and civil––21%outside top 12
Human resources––21%outside top 12
General management & consulting––10%outside top 12
Hospitality and food service––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

DuckDB is named by 135 companies in job postings and Amazon Redshift by 1,665; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-redshift-vs-duckdb)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Amazon Redshift vs DuckDB: questions

Which is more used, Amazon Redshift or DuckDB?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Amazon Redshift (1,665) over DuckDB (135). By website-and-DNS footprint, DuckDB (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Amazon Redshift?

46% of Amazon Redshift companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 57% for DuckDB. 29% of Amazon Redshift companies have over 1,000 employees, against 19% for DuckDB.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon Redshift in marketing and DuckDB in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Amazon Redshift or DuckDB. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market