Amazon Redshift VS Oracle Essbase
As of 30 October 2026, Oracle Essbase is named by 203 companies and Amazon Redshift by 1,665; Amazon Redshift skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 15%), Oracle Essbase to companies over 1,000 (73% vs 29%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon Redshift's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Oracle Essbase rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Amazon Redshift: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- Oracle Essbase: 2–200 employees
- 15%
- Amazon Redshift: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Oracle Essbase: 1,000+ employees
- 73%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.5 · 4.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Amazon Redshift | share | Oracle Essbase | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 15 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 113 | 7% | 9 | 4% | Amazon Redshift |
| 11-50 employees | 238 | 14% | 13 | 6% | Amazon Redshift |
| 51-200 employees | 422 | 25% | 8 | 4% | Amazon Redshift |
| 201-500 employees | 236 | 14% | 8 | 4% | Amazon Redshift |
| 501-1000 employees | 160 | 10% | 15 | 7% | Amazon Redshift |
| 1001-5000 employees | 252 | 15% | 48 | 24% | Oracle Essbase |
| 5001-10000 employees | 69 | 4% | 24 | 12% | Oracle Essbase |
| 10,001+ employees | 160 | 10% | 76 | 37% | Oracle Essbase |
| Segment | Amazon Redshift | share | Oracle Essbase | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 870 | 52% | 34 | 17% | Amazon Redshift |
| Business & finance services | 345 | 21% | 60 | 30% | Oracle Essbase |
| Manufacturing & industry | 106 | 6% | 33 | 16% | Oracle Essbase |
| Media & content | 98 | 6% | 12 | 6% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 47 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 44 | 3% | 9 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 34 | 2% | 9 | 4% | Oracle Essbase |
| Health care | 28 | 2% | 11 | 5% | Oracle Essbase |
| Public, community & associations | 26 | 2% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 21 | 1% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 18 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 15 | 1% | 6 | 3% | Oracle Essbase |
| Automotive | – | – | 9 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon Redshift | share | Oracle Essbase | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,163 | 70% | 149 | 73% | Oracle Essbase |
| United Kingdom | 120 | 7% | 11 | 5% | even |
| India | 51 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Amazon Redshift |
| Canada | 38 | 2% | 14 | 7% | Oracle Essbase |
| Germany | 38 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| France | 34 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 22 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 15 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 14 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Japan | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Greece | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Romania | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Amazon Redshift | share | Oracle Essbase | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 3,783 | 64% | 38 | 3% | Amazon Redshift |
| Software engineering | 776 | 13% | 35 | 3% | Amazon Redshift |
| IT operations & business systems | 326 | 6% | 146 | 12% | Oracle Essbase |
| Product, program & project management | 107 | 2% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 99 | 2% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 90 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 48 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 36 | 1% | 826 | 68% | Oracle Essbase |
| Engineering (non-software) | 24 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 22 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 14 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 13 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Amazon Redshift →
Companies using Oracle Essbase →
data warehouses olap ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Oracle Essbase is named by 203 companies in job postings and Amazon Redshift by 1,665; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-redshift-vs-oracle-essbase)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Amazon Redshift vs Oracle Essbase: questions
Which is more used, Amazon Redshift or Oracle Essbase?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Amazon Redshift (1,665) over Oracle Essbase (203). By website-and-DNS footprint, Oracle Essbase (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Amazon Redshift?
46% of Amazon Redshift companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 15% for Oracle Essbase. 29% of Amazon Redshift companies have over 1,000 employees, against 73% for Oracle Essbase.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon Redshift in marketing and Oracle Essbase in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Amazon Redshift or Oracle Essbase. Start free, no card.