Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · mlops platforms

Amazon SageMaker VS MLflow

As of 4 November 2026, MLflow is named by 1,756 companies and Amazon SageMaker by 1,384; Amazon SageMaker skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 41%), MLflow to companies over 1,000 (35% vs 36%).

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Amazon SageMaker's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, MLflow rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Amazon SageMaker: 2–200 employees
38%
MLflow: 2–200 employees
41%
Amazon SageMaker: 1,000+ employees
36%
MLflow: 1,000+ employees
35%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.6 · 2.4
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
1,384companies name Amazon SageMaker
1,756companies name MLflow
637name both
3,623 · 4,244postings in 90 days, Amazon SageMaker · MLflow
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentAmazon SageMakershareMLflowshareLeans
Self-employed363%503%even
2-10 employees997%16810%MLflow
11-50 employees15911%22113%even
51-200 employees27220%32719%even
201-500 employees18413%21712%even
501-1000 employees13810%1529%even
1001-5000 employees22616%27816%even
5001-10000 employees675%895%even
10,001+ employees20315%25414%even
By industry
SegmentAmazon SageMakershareMLflowshareLeans
Technology & software69550%84348%Amazon SageMaker
Business & finance services33824%39022%Amazon SageMaker
Manufacturing & industry1078%17410%MLflow
Media & content534%593%even
Utilities & infrastructure393%372%even
Commerce & trade342%553%even
Consumer services & leisure312%453%even
Public, community & associations272%483%even
Health care141%241%even
Automotive131%181%even
Hospitality & travel111%––outside top 12
Property & construction91%191%even
Transport, logistics & rental––261%outside top 12
By country
SegmentAmazon SageMakershareMLflowshareLeans
United States88064%99757%Amazon SageMaker
United Kingdom987%1237%even
Germany453%744%even
India413%473%even
Canada383%533%even
France282%684%even
Australia201%251%even
Spain161%191%even
Japan141%––outside top 12
Poland131%––outside top 12
Netherlands121%282%even
Sweden121%––outside top 12
Brazil––302%outside top 12
Singapore––201%outside top 12
Switzerland––171%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentAmazon SageMakershareMLflowshareLeans
Data & AI2,90060%4,07375%MLflow
Software engineering72515%4869%Amazon SageMaker
IT operations & business systems2976%1443%Amazon SageMaker
Product, program & project management1192%591%even
Sales782%551%even
Customer service & success361%10%even
Engineering (non-software)321%250%even
General management & consulting291%311%even
Legal, compliance & risk261%120%even
Unclassified130%80%even
Marketing & communications120%100%even
Business development & strategy90%40%even
Finance & accounting90%80%even
Research and science80%220%even
Education & training60%––outside top 12
Construction and civil50%10%even
Quality, safety & environment30%40%even
Arts media and entertainment20%––outside top 12
Human resources20%10%even
Administration & office10%20%even
Design & UX10%10%even
Healthcare clinical10%20%even
Logistics warehouse and transport10%50%even
Hospitality and food service––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

MLflow is named by 1,756 companies in job postings and Amazon SageMaker by 1,384; 637 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/amazon-sagemaker-vs-mlflow)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Amazon SageMaker vs MLflow: questions

Which is more used, Amazon SageMaker or MLflow?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, MLflow (1,756) over Amazon SageMaker (1,384). By website-and-DNS footprint, MLflow (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Amazon SageMaker?

38% of Amazon SageMaker companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for MLflow. 36% of Amazon SageMaker companies have over 1,000 employees, against 35% for MLflow.

Do companies run both?

637 companies name both in their postings, usually Amazon SageMaker in marketing and MLflow in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Amazon SageMaker or MLflow. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market