Tools · Category

mlops platforms, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, MLflow leads mlops platforms with 1,756 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Amazon SageMaker at 1,384.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
MLflow · 1,756
Runner-up
Amazon SageMaker · 1,384
Most hiring, 90 days
MLflow
Highest postings per company
NVIDIA AI Enterprise
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
8,464companies across the category
21%of them on MLflow
21,638postings naming a mlops platform in 90 days
29tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every mlops platform we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
MLflowLinux Foundation
1,756
4,2442.4
2
1,384
3,6232.6
3
Vertex AIGoogle
1,163
4,0263.5
4
738
1,7192.3
5
KubeflowLinux Foundation
640
1,4642.3
6
LangSmithLangChain
580
1,6282.8
7
LangfuseLangfuse
557
1,0912.0
8
Weights & BiasesCoreWeave (Weights & Biases)
367
6921.9
9
DVCIterative
189
2521.3
10
BraintrustBraintrust
152
3102.0
11
136
2912.1
12
PromptfooPromptfoo
115
2552.2
13
Mosaic AIDatabricks
88
3063.5
14
82
2322.8
15
71
3104.4
16
FeastLinux Foundation
71
1412.0
17
BigQuery MLGoogle
43
701.6
18
CVATCVAT.ai
39
681.7
19
Label StudioHumanSignal
39
982.5
20
TectonTecton
36
752.1
21
SAP AI CoreSAP
34
2086.1
22
Vertex AI PipelinesGoogle
31
872.8
23
ClearMLClearML
28
511.8
24
Amazon SageMaker PipelinesAmazon Web Services
27
542.0
25
TensorFlow ExtendedGoogle
27
582.1
26
NVIDIA AI EnterpriseNVIDIA
25
1747.0
27
DataRobotDataRobot
19
693.6
28
KedroLinux Foundation
17
281.6
29
OpikComet
10
141.4
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

MLflow leads mlops platforms with 1,756 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Amazon SageMaker at 1,384. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/mlops-platforms)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

mlops platforms: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free