Angular Material VS shadcn/ui
As of 30 October 2026, shadcn/ui is named by 186 companies and Angular Material by 123; Angular Material skews to companies under 200 people (54% vs 72%), shadcn/ui to companies over 1,000 (10% vs 30%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Angular Material's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, shadcn/ui rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Angular Material: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- shadcn/ui: 2–200 employees
- 72%
- Angular Material: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- shadcn/ui: 1,000+ employees
- 10%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.7 · 1.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Angular Material | share | shadcn/ui | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 6 | 5% | 41 | 22% | shadcn/ui |
| 11-50 employees | 29 | 24% | 59 | 32% | shadcn/ui |
| 51-200 employees | 31 | 25% | 34 | 18% | Angular Material |
| 201-500 employees | 12 | 10% | 15 | 8% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 8 | 7% | 9 | 5% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 21 | 17% | 10 | 5% | Angular Material |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 5% | 1 | 1% | Angular Material |
| 10,001+ employees | 10 | 8% | 8 | 4% | Angular Material |
| Self-employed | – | – | 9 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Angular Material | share | shadcn/ui | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 80 | 65% | 117 | 63% | Angular Material |
| Business & finance services | 16 | 13% | 31 | 17% | shadcn/ui |
| Manufacturing & industry | 9 | 7% | 9 | 5% | Angular Material |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Angular Material |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 7 | 4% | shadcn/ui |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 6 | 3% | shadcn/ui |
| Automotive | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Angular Material | share | shadcn/ui | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 60 | 49% | 90 | 48% | even |
| Germany | 9 | 7% | 20 | 11% | shadcn/ui |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 7% | 16 | 9% | shadcn/ui |
| India | 8 | 7% | 4 | 2% | Angular Material |
| Poland | 8 | 7% | 6 | 3% | Angular Material |
| Brazil | 5 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 4 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Italy | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Angular Material | share | shadcn/ui | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 285 | 89% | 263 | 76% | Angular Material |
| Design & UX | 9 | 3% | 26 | 7% | shadcn/ui |
| IT operations & business systems | 6 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 2 | 1% | 18 | 5% | shadcn/ui |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 9 | 3% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Angular Material →
Companies using shadcn/ui →
ui component css libraries ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
shadcn/ui is named by 186 companies in job postings and Angular Material by 123; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/angular-material-vs-shadcn-ui)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Angular Material vs shadcn/ui: questions
Which is more used, Angular Material or shadcn/ui?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, shadcn/ui (186) over Angular Material (123). By website-and-DNS footprint, shadcn/ui (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Angular Material?
54% of Angular Material companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 72% for shadcn/ui. 30% of Angular Material companies have over 1,000 employees, against 10% for shadcn/ui.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Angular Material in marketing and shadcn/ui in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Angular Material or shadcn/ui. Start free, no card.