Tools · Category

ui component css libraries, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, Tailwind CSS leads ui component css libraries with 2,153 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Bootstrap at 2,098.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
Tailwind CSS · 2,153
Runner-up
Bootstrap · 2,098
Most hiring, 90 days
Bootstrap
Highest postings per company
Fluent UI
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
6,625companies across the category
32%of them on Tailwind CSS
11,058postings naming a ui component css librarie in 90 days
24tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every ui component css librarie we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
Tailwind CSSTailwind Labs
2,153
3,2871.5
2
BootstrapBootstrap
2,098
4,1012.0
3
547
8701.6
4
shadcn/uishadcn
254
2861.1
5
styled-componentsstyled-components
178
2461.4
6
170
2021.2
7
155
2531.6
8
131
2131.6
9
TelerikProgress
95
1711.8
10
DevExpressDevExpress
91
2342.6
11
Ant DesignAnt Group
89
1341.5
12
CSS ModulesCSS Modules contributors
77
1001.3
13
AG GridAG Grid
72
1351.9
14
Kendo UIProgress
69
1121.6
15
VuetifyVuetify
64
771.2
16
Radix UIWorkOS
60
661.1
17
PrimeNGPrimeTek
58
891.5
18
PrimeFacesPrimeTek
54
1001.9
19
Chakra UIChakra UI
51
831.6
20
Oracle RedwoodOracle
48
1242.6
21
jQuery MobileOpenJS Foundation
42
270.6
22
jQuery UIOpenJS Foundation
38
862.3
23
Fluent UIMicrosoft
17
462.7
24
InfragisticsInfragistics
14
161.1
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Tailwind CSS leads ui component css libraries with 2,153 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Bootstrap at 2,098. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/ui-component-css-libraries)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

ui component css libraries: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free