Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEMaterial Design VS Tailwind CSS_
As of 4 November 2026, Tailwind CSS is named by 2,153 companies and Material Design by 170; Material Design skews to companies under 200 people (66% vs 68%), Tailwind CSS to companies over 1,000 (9% vs 15%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Material Design's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Tailwind CSS rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Material Design: 2–200 employees
- 66%
- Tailwind CSS: 2–200 employees
- 68%
- Material Design: 1,000+ employees
- 15%
- Tailwind CSS: 1,000+ employees
- 9%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.2 · 1.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Material Design | share | Tailwind CSS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 7 | 4% | 225 | 10% | Tailwind CSS |
| 2-10 employees | 22 | 13% | 502 | 23% | Tailwind CSS |
| 11-50 employees | 50 | 29% | 638 | 30% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 40 | 24% | 334 | 16% | Material Design |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 11% | 173 | 8% | Material Design |
| 501-1000 employees | 7 | 4% | 92 | 4% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 15 | 9% | 103 | 5% | Material Design |
| 5001-10000 employees | 2 | 1% | 31 | 1% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 9 | 5% | 55 | 3% | Material Design |
| Segment | Material Design | share | Tailwind CSS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 103 | 61% | 1,298 | 60% | even |
| Business & finance services | 31 | 18% | 426 | 20% | even |
| Media & content | 9 | 5% | 87 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 8 | 5% | 82 | 4% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 8 | 5% | 65 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 2% | 28 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | 46 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 20 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 21 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | – | – | 29 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 24 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Material Design | share | Tailwind CSS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 81 | 48% | 1,101 | 51% | Tailwind CSS |
| India | 27 | 16% | 154 | 7% | Material Design |
| Germany | 7 | 4% | 157 | 7% | Tailwind CSS |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% | 137 | 6% | Tailwind CSS |
| Netherlands | 5 | 3% | 53 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% | 21 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 35 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 1% | 52 | 2% | even |
| Greece | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 38 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 35 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 28 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 26 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Material Design | share | Tailwind CSS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 234 | 67% | 3,709 | 78% | Tailwind CSS |
| Design & UX | 60 | 17% | 174 | 4% | Material Design |
| Data & AI | 15 | 4% | 145 | 3% | even |
| Unclassified | 7 | 2% | 44 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 1% | 19 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 1 | 0% | 34 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 134 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 18 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 16 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 16 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 10 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| procurement and purchasing | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Material Design →
Companies using Tailwind CSS →
ui component css libraries ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Tailwind CSS is named by 2,153 companies in job postings and Material Design by 170; 13 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/material-design-vs-tailwind-css)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Material Design vs Tailwind CSS: questions
Which is more used, Material Design or Tailwind CSS?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Tailwind CSS (2,153) over Material Design (170). By website-and-DNS footprint, Tailwind CSS (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Material Design?
66% of Material Design companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 68% for Tailwind CSS. 15% of Material Design companies have over 1,000 employees, against 9% for Tailwind CSS.
Do companies run both?
13 companies name both in their postings, usually Material Design in marketing and Tailwind CSS in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and get 1,000 records free.