Bootstrap VS Material Design_
As of 4 November 2026, Material Design is named by 170 companies and Bootstrap by 2,098; Bootstrap skews to companies under 200 people (68% vs 66%), Material Design to companies over 1,000 (15% vs 13%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Bootstrap's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Material Design rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Bootstrap: 2–200 employees
- 68%
- Material Design: 2–200 employees
- 66%
- Bootstrap: 1,000+ employees
- 13%
- Material Design: 1,000+ employees
- 15%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 1.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 6,088,576 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Bootstrap | share | Material Design | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 56 | 3% | 7 | 4% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 277 | 13% | 22 | 13% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 675 | 32% | 50 | 29% | Bootstrap |
| 51-200 employees | 465 | 22% | 40 | 24% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 235 | 11% | 18 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 107 | 5% | 7 | 4% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 133 | 6% | 15 | 9% | Material Design |
| 5001-10000 employees | 45 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 105 | 5% | 9 | 5% | even |
| Segment | Bootstrap | share | Material Design | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 1,194 | 57% | 103 | 61% | Material Design |
| Business & finance services | 498 | 24% | 31 | 18% | Bootstrap |
| Manufacturing & industry | 88 | 4% | 8 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 74 | 4% | 8 | 5% | even |
| Media & content | 58 | 3% | 9 | 5% | Material Design |
| Commerce & trade | 38 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 35 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 28 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 24 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 20 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 18 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 11 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Bootstrap | share | Material Design | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 991 | 47% | 81 | 48% | even |
| India | 293 | 14% | 27 | 16% | even |
| United Kingdom | 123 | 6% | 5 | 3% | Bootstrap |
| Germany | 109 | 5% | 7 | 4% | even |
| Italy | 56 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 49 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| France | 43 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 32 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 25 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 23 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 22 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 17 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Greece | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Bootstrap | share | Material Design | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 5,037 | 74% | 234 | 67% | Bootstrap |
| Design & UX | 641 | 9% | 60 | 17% | Material Design |
| IT operations & business systems | 173 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Bootstrap |
| Data & AI | 55 | 1% | 15 | 4% | Material Design |
| Retail & store operations | 35 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 34 | 0% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 33 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 30 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | 27 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 25 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 23 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 18 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| healthcare support and caregiving | 18 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 18 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 17 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 14 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| social care and community | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| real estate and property | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| research and science | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Bootstrap →
Companies using Material Design →
ui component css libraries ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Material Design is named by 170 companies in job postings and Bootstrap by 2,098; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/bootstrap-vs-material-design)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Bootstrap vs Material Design: questions
Which is more used, Bootstrap or Material Design?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Bootstrap (2,098) over Material Design (170). By website-and-DNS footprint, Bootstrap (6,088,576 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Bootstrap?
68% of Bootstrap companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 66% for Material Design. 13% of Bootstrap companies have over 1,000 employees, against 15% for Material Design.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Bootstrap in marketing and Material Design in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Bootstrap or Material Design, and get 1,000 records free.