Arm Cortex VS RISC-V
As of 30 October 2026, RISC-V is named by 110 companies and Arm Cortex by 122; Arm Cortex skews to companies under 200 people (48% vs 55%), RISC-V to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 35%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Arm Cortex's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, RISC-V rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Arm Cortex: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- RISC-V: 2–200 employees
- 55%
- Arm Cortex: 1,000+ employees
- 35%
- RISC-V: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.4 · 10.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Arm Cortex | share | RISC-V | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 7% | 17 | 15% | RISC-V |
| 11-50 employees | 20 | 16% | 24 | 22% | RISC-V |
| 51-200 employees | 30 | 25% | 20 | 18% | Arm Cortex |
| 201-500 employees | 12 | 10% | 9 | 8% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 9 | 7% | 2 | 2% | Arm Cortex |
| 1001-5000 employees | 20 | 16% | 14 | 13% | Arm Cortex |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 6% | 5 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 16 | 13% | 17 | 15% | RISC-V |
| Self-employed | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Arm Cortex | share | RISC-V | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 71 | 58% | 35 | 32% | Arm Cortex |
| Technology & software | 23 | 19% | 40 | 36% | RISC-V |
| Business & finance services | 9 | 7% | 15 | 14% | RISC-V |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 4% | 5 | 5% | even |
| Automotive | 4 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 4 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 2% | 6 | 5% | RISC-V |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Arm Cortex | share | RISC-V | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 64 | 52% | 65 | 59% | RISC-V |
| Germany | 17 | 14% | 5 | 5% | Arm Cortex |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 7% | 10 | 9% | even |
| France | 7 | 6% | 3 | 3% | Arm Cortex |
| India | 4 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 3 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Czechia | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Lithuania | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| BD | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| China | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Arm Cortex | share | RISC-V | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 232 | 62% | 488 | 33% | Arm Cortex |
| Engineering (non-software) | 83 | 22% | 582 | 39% | RISC-V |
| Sales | 14 | 4% | 24 | 2% | Arm Cortex |
| IT operations & business systems | 6 | 2% | 81 | 5% | RISC-V |
| Data & AI | 3 | 1% | 49 | 3% | RISC-V |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 1% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 27 | 2% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Arm Cortex →
Companies using RISC-V →
compute processors ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
RISC-V is named by 110 companies in job postings and Arm Cortex by 122; 31 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/arm-cortex-vs-risc-v)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Arm Cortex vs RISC-V: questions
Which is more used, Arm Cortex or RISC-V?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Arm Cortex (122) over RISC-V (110). By website-and-DNS footprint, RISC-V (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Arm Cortex?
48% of Arm Cortex companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 55% for RISC-V. 35% of Arm Cortex companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for RISC-V.
Do companies run both?
31 companies name both in their postings, usually Arm Cortex in marketing and RISC-V in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Arm Cortex or RISC-V. Start free, no card.