Cisco UCS VS Zynq
As of 30 October 2026, Zynq is named by 116 companies and Cisco UCS by 155; Cisco UCS skews to companies under 200 people (28% vs 50%), Zynq to companies over 1,000 (32% vs 43%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Cisco UCS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Zynq rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Cisco UCS: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- Zynq: 2–200 employees
- 50%
- Cisco UCS: 1,000+ employees
- 43%
- Zynq: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 2.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Cisco UCS | share | Zynq | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 3 | 2% | 12 | 10% | Zynq |
| 11-50 employees | 14 | 9% | 20 | 17% | Zynq |
| 51-200 employees | 26 | 17% | 26 | 22% | Zynq |
| 201-500 employees | 27 | 17% | 14 | 12% | Cisco UCS |
| 501-1000 employees | 17 | 11% | 7 | 6% | Cisco UCS |
| 1001-5000 employees | 33 | 21% | 15 | 13% | Cisco UCS |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 7% | 5 | 4% | Cisco UCS |
| 10,001+ employees | 23 | 15% | 17 | 15% | even |
| Segment | Cisco UCS | share | Zynq | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 68 | 44% | 22 | 19% | Cisco UCS |
| Business & finance services | 27 | 17% | 15 | 13% | Cisco UCS |
| Manufacturing & industry | 22 | 14% | 60 | 52% | Zynq |
| Health care | 8 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 7 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 5% | 10 | 9% | Zynq |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Cisco UCS |
| Automotive | 3 | 2% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cisco UCS | share | Zynq | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 119 | 77% | 70 | 60% | Cisco UCS |
| Canada | 6 | 4% | 2 | 2% | Cisco UCS |
| Germany | 5 | 3% | 9 | 8% | Zynq |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 2 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 1% | 7 | 6% | Zynq |
| India | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Poland | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cisco UCS | share | Zynq | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 331 | 59% | 2 | 1% | Cisco UCS |
| Engineering (non-software) | 56 | 10% | 194 | 53% | Zynq |
| Sales | 30 | 5% | 4 | 1% | Cisco UCS |
| Software engineering | 20 | 4% | 138 | 38% | Zynq |
| Customer service & success | 10 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Cisco UCS →
Companies using Zynq →
compute processors ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Zynq is named by 116 companies in job postings and Cisco UCS by 155; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/cisco-ucs-vs-zynq)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Cisco UCS vs Zynq: questions
Which is more used, Cisco UCS or Zynq?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Cisco UCS (155) over Zynq (116). By website-and-DNS footprint, Zynq (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Cisco UCS?
28% of Cisco UCS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 50% for Zynq. 43% of Cisco UCS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 32% for Zynq.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Cisco UCS in marketing and Zynq in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Cisco UCS or Zynq. Start free, no card.