FloQast VS CCH Tagetik
As of 30 October 2026, CCH Tagetik is named by 158 companies and FloQast by 137; FloQast skews to companies under 200 people (28% vs 18%), CCH Tagetik to companies over 1,000 (63% vs 38%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: FloQast's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, CCH Tagetik rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- FloQast: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- CCH Tagetik: 2–200 employees
- 18%
- FloQast: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- CCH Tagetik: 1,000+ employees
- 63%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.4 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | FloQast | share | CCH Tagetik | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 5 | 4% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 10 | 7% | 13 | 8% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 24 | 18% | 13 | 8% | FloQast |
| 201-500 employees | 24 | 18% | 18 | 11% | FloQast |
| 501-1000 employees | 22 | 16% | 11 | 7% | FloQast |
| 1001-5000 employees | 41 | 30% | 45 | 28% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 9 | 7% | 24 | 15% | CCH Tagetik |
| 10,001+ employees | 2 | 1% | 31 | 20% | CCH Tagetik |
| Segment | FloQast | share | CCH Tagetik | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 51 | 37% | 19 | 12% | FloQast |
| Business & finance services | 27 | 20% | 36 | 23% | CCH Tagetik |
| Manufacturing & industry | 19 | 14% | 50 | 32% | CCH Tagetik |
| Commerce & trade | 9 | 7% | 18 | 11% | CCH Tagetik |
| Property & construction | 6 | 4% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 4 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 4 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 4 | 3% | 1 | 1% | FloQast |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 4 | 3% | 11 | 7% | CCH Tagetik |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Segment | FloQast | share | CCH Tagetik | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 124 | 91% | 41 | 26% | FloQast |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% | 17 | 11% | CCH Tagetik |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | 23 | 15% | CCH Tagetik |
| Finland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 17 | 11% | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 15 | 9% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 7 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FloQast | share | CCH Tagetik | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 180 | 70% | 254 | 52% | FloQast |
| IT operations & business systems | 26 | 10% | 61 | 12% | CCH Tagetik |
| Customer service & success | 9 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 6 | 2% | 62 | 13% | CCH Tagetik |
| Product, program & project management | 6 | 2% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 5 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Software engineering | 4 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 10 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using FloQast →
Companies using CCH Tagetik →
fpa treasury close ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
CCH Tagetik is named by 158 companies in job postings and FloQast by 137; 3 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/floqast-vs-tagetik)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FloQast vs CCH Tagetik: questions
Which is more used, FloQast or CCH Tagetik?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, CCH Tagetik (158) over FloQast (137). By website-and-DNS footprint, CCH Tagetik (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses FloQast?
28% of FloQast companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 18% for CCH Tagetik. 38% of FloQast companies have over 1,000 employees, against 63% for CCH Tagetik.
Do companies run both?
3 companies name both in their postings, usually FloQast in marketing and CCH Tagetik in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on FloQast or CCH Tagetik. Start free, no card.