Start free
Tools · Category

fpa treasury close, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, Anaplan leads fpa treasury close with 916 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Workday Adaptive Planning at 902.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
Anaplan · 916
Runner-up
Workday Adaptive Planning · 902
Most hiring, 90 days
Oracle Hyperion
Highest postings per company
Oracle Hyperion
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
8,538companies across the category
11%of them on Anaplan
23,559postings naming a fpa treasury close in 90 days
40tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every fpa treasury close we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
AnaplanAnaplan
916
2,8333.1
2
Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday
902
1,7401.9
3
Oracle HyperionOracle
784
3,7394.8
4
OneStreamOneStream
633
2,1173.3
5
BlackLineBlackLine
497
1,4993.0
6
WorkivaWorkiva
439
8391.9
7
Oracle Hyperion Financial ManagementOracle
385
1,0742.8
8
SAP BPCSAP
356
1,1793.3
9
IBM Planning Analytics (TM1)IBM
343
8792.6
10
Oracle EPMOracle
306
1,3664.5
11
LucanetLucanet
254
4031.6
12
KyribaKyriba
247
5032.0
13
PigmentPigment
242
4561.9
14
CCH TagetikWolters Kluwer
194
4532.3
15
FloQastFloQast
188
2441.3
16
Oracle Financial Consolidation and CloseOracle
185
4412.4
17
SAP Group ReportingSAP
160
4893.1
18
Oracle EPM Planning and Budgeting Cloud ServiceOracle
156
4082.6
19
Board InternationalBoard International
136
2201.6
20
PlanfulPlanful
131
1931.5
21
Oracle Smart ViewOracle
128
3712.9
22
VenaVena Solutions
112
1761.6
23
Oracle Account ReconciliationOracle
103
2942.9
24
Oracle Hyperion PlanningOracle
87
2182.5
25
FathomFathom
75
1492.0
26
JedoxJedox
67
1131.7
27
Workiva WdeskWorkiva
63
891.4
28
SAP Treasury and Risk ManagementSAP
62
2083.4
29
SAP BFCSAP
49
1022.1
30
Oracle FDMEEOracle
44
992.3
31
ARIESHalliburton
41
711.7
32
DatarailsDatarails
37
451.2
33
LongviewTidemark
34
1484.4
34
NetSuite Planning and BudgetingOracle
32
341.1
35
TrintechTrintech
32
792.5
36
GTreasuryGTreasury
27
481.8
37
MagnitudeMagnitude Software
25
622.5
38
AbacumAbacum
24
572.4
39
SAP TRMSAP
22
733.3
40
AgicapAgicap
20
482.4
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Anaplan vs Workday Adaptive Planning916 · 902Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion916 · 784Anaplan vs OneStream916 · 633Anaplan vs BlackLine916 · 497Anaplan vs Workiva916 · 439Workday Adaptive Planning vs Oracle Hyperion902 · 784Workday Adaptive Planning vs OneStream902 · 633Workday Adaptive Planning vs BlackLine902 · 497Workday Adaptive Planning vs Workiva902 · 439Oracle Hyperion vs OneStream784 · 633Oracle Hyperion vs BlackLine784 · 497Oracle Hyperion vs Workiva784 · 439OneStream vs BlackLine633 · 497OneStream vs Workiva633 · 439BlackLine vs Workiva497 · 439
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Anaplan leads fpa treasury close with 916 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Workday Adaptive Planning at 902. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/fpa-treasury-close)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

fpa treasury close: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

Start free with 1,000 records
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free