IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) VS Oracle Hyperion Financial Management
As of 30 October 2026, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management is named by 291 companies and IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) by 252; IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) skews to companies under 200 people (16% vs 13%), Oracle Hyperion Financial Management to companies over 1,000 (72% vs 65%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: IBM Planning Analytics (TM1)'s script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- IBM Planning Analytics (TM1): 2–200 employees
- 16%
- Oracle Hyperion Financial Management: 2–200 employees
- 13%
- IBM Planning Analytics (TM1): 1,000+ employees
- 65%
- Oracle Hyperion Financial Management: 1,000+ employees
- 72%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 3.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) | share | Oracle Hyperion Financial Management | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 6 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 17 | 7% | 10 | 3% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| 51-200 employees | 18 | 7% | 23 | 8% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 17 | 7% | 18 | 6% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 30 | 12% | 25 | 9% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| 1001-5000 employees | 62 | 25% | 60 | 21% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| 5001-10000 employees | 31 | 12% | 26 | 9% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| 10,001+ employees | 70 | 28% | 123 | 42% | Oracle Hyperion Financial Management |
| Segment | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) | share | Oracle Hyperion Financial Management | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 68 | 27% | 123 | 42% | Oracle Hyperion Financial Management |
| Business & finance services | 48 | 19% | 55 | 19% | even |
| Technology & software | 39 | 15% | 23 | 8% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| Commerce & trade | 21 | 8% | 13 | 4% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 16 | 6% | 13 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 14 | 6% | 2 | 1% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| Property & construction | 12 | 5% | 8 | 3% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| Public, community & associations | 9 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 7 | 3% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 6 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 5 | 2% | 10 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 4 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 19 | 7% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) | share | Oracle Hyperion Financial Management | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 139 | 55% | 163 | 56% | even |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 9% | 31 | 11% | even |
| Germany | 21 | 8% | 13 | 4% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| Australia | 13 | 5% | 10 | 3% | even |
| France | 11 | 4% | 16 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 8 | 3% | 11 | 4% | even |
| Austria | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Bulgaria | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Italy | – | – | 6 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) | share | Oracle Hyperion Financial Management | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 445 | 51% | 916 | 72% | Oracle Hyperion Financial Management |
| IT operations & business systems | 82 | 9% | 137 | 11% | even |
| Data & AI | 52 | 6% | 17 | 1% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| Product, program & project management | 34 | 4% | 8 | 1% | IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) |
| Software engineering | 22 | 3% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 14 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 14 | 2% | 4 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 13 | 1% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Travel, leisure & events | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 7 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | – | – | 15 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Procurement and purchasing | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) →
Companies using Oracle Hyperion Financial Management →
fpa treasury close ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Oracle Hyperion Financial Management is named by 291 companies in job postings and IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) by 252; 22 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ibm-planning-analytics-vs-oracle-hyperion-financial-management)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) vs Oracle Hyperion Financial Management: questions
Which is more used, IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) or Oracle Hyperion Financial Management?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management (291) over IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) (252). By website-and-DNS footprint, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses IBM Planning Analytics (TM1)?
16% of IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 13% for Oracle Hyperion Financial Management. 65% of IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) companies have over 1,000 employees, against 72% for Oracle Hyperion Financial Management.
Do companies run both?
22 companies name both in their postings, usually IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) in marketing and Oracle Hyperion Financial Management in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) or Oracle Hyperion Financial Management. Start free, no card.