Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · mlops platforms

Kubeflow VS Weights & Biases

As of 30 October 2026, Weights & Biases is named by 283 companies and Kubeflow by 497; Kubeflow skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 51%), Weights & Biases to companies over 1,000 (23% vs 33%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Kubeflow's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Weights & Biases rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Kubeflow: 2–200 employees
42%
Weights & Biases: 2–200 employees
51%
Kubeflow: 1,000+ employees
33%
Weights & Biases: 1,000+ employees
23%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.4 · 2.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
497companies name Kubeflow
283companies name Weights & Biases
91name both
1,176 · 591postings in 90 days, Kubeflow · Weights & Biases
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentKubeflowshareWeights & BiasesshareLeans
Self-employed82%93%even
2-10 employees439%4215%Weights & Biases
11-50 employees7014%4315%even
51-200 employees9419%5820%even
201-500 employees7214%3813%even
501-1000 employees449%2810%even
1001-5000 employees7715%4114%even
5001-10000 employees235%93%even
10,001+ employees6613%155%Kubeflow
By industry
SegmentKubeflowshareWeights & BiasesshareLeans
Technology & software27756%13548%Kubeflow
Business & finance services8216%4717%even
Manufacturing & industry5511%3613%even
Media & content255%166%even
Commerce & trade133%52%even
Public, community & associations122%135%Weights & Biases
Consumer services & leisure82%124%Weights & Biases
Utilities & infrastructure71%21%even
Transport, logistics & rental61%83%even
Property & construction41%31%even
Health care31%31%even
Automotive20%21%even
By country
SegmentKubeflowshareWeights & BiasesshareLeans
United States31163%19669%Weights & Biases
United Kingdom357%186%even
France204%62%even
India194%124%even
Germany173%104%even
Canada133%93%even
Netherlands71%––outside top 12
Poland71%21%even
United Arab Emirates51%31%even
Finland51%––outside top 12
Portugal51%––outside top 12
Australia41%––outside top 12
Singapore––52%outside top 12
Switzerland––21%outside top 12
Ireland––21%outside top 12
Italy––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentKubeflowshareWeights & BiasesshareLeans
Data & AI1,16171%59369%Kubeflow
Software engineering21913%8610%Kubeflow
IT operations & business systems413%314%even
Sales211%182%even
Product, program & project management201%111%even
General management & consulting50%51%even
Customer service & success40%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)40%40%even
Marketing & communications30%––outside top 12
Construction and civil10%––outside top 12
Design & UX10%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting10%40%even
Legal, compliance & risk––71%outside top 12
Research and science––40%outside top 12
Education & training––30%outside top 12
Administration & office––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Weights & Biases is named by 283 companies in job postings and Kubeflow by 497; 91 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/kubeflow-vs-weights-and-biases)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Kubeflow vs Weights & Biases: questions

Which is more used, Kubeflow or Weights & Biases?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Kubeflow (497) over Weights & Biases (283). By website-and-DNS footprint, Weights & Biases (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Kubeflow?

42% of Kubeflow companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 51% for Weights & Biases. 33% of Kubeflow companies have over 1,000 employees, against 23% for Weights & Biases.

Do companies run both?

91 companies name both in their postings, usually Kubeflow in marketing and Weights & Biases in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Kubeflow or Weights & Biases. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market