Kyriba VS SAP Group Reporting
As of 30 October 2026, SAP Group Reporting is named by 124 companies and Kyriba by 178; Kyriba skews to companies under 200 people (9% vs 19%), SAP Group Reporting to companies over 1,000 (67% vs 67%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Kyriba's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP Group Reporting rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Kyriba: 2–200 employees
- 9%
- SAP Group Reporting: 2–200 employees
- 19%
- Kyriba: 1,000+ employees
- 67%
- SAP Group Reporting: 1,000+ employees
- 67%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 3.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Kyriba | share | SAP Group Reporting | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 5 | 3% | 6 | 5% | SAP Group Reporting |
| 51-200 employees | 10 | 6% | 16 | 13% | SAP Group Reporting |
| 201-500 employees | 23 | 13% | 7 | 6% | Kyriba |
| 501-1000 employees | 18 | 10% | 10 | 8% | Kyriba |
| 1001-5000 employees | 46 | 26% | 32 | 26% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 23 | 13% | 14 | 11% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 50 | 28% | 37 | 30% | even |
| Segment | Kyriba | share | SAP Group Reporting | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 58 | 33% | 25 | 20% | Kyriba |
| Technology & software | 35 | 20% | 20 | 16% | Kyriba |
| Manufacturing & industry | 28 | 16% | 47 | 38% | SAP Group Reporting |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 11 | 6% | 9 | 7% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 10 | 6% | 4 | 3% | Kyriba |
| Property & construction | 9 | 5% | 3 | 2% | Kyriba |
| Automotive | 8 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 5 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Kyriba |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Kyriba | share | SAP Group Reporting | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 95 | 53% | 57 | 46% | Kyriba |
| France | 27 | 15% | 5 | 4% | Kyriba |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 13% | 15 | 12% | even |
| Germany | 6 | 3% | 17 | 14% | SAP Group Reporting |
| Canada | 4 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% | 5 | 4% | SAP Group Reporting |
| Italy | 3 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Kyriba | share | SAP Group Reporting | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 273 | 50% | 106 | 22% | Kyriba |
| IT operations & business systems | 104 | 19% | 268 | 54% | SAP Group Reporting |
| Product, program & project management | 39 | 7% | 6 | 1% | Kyriba |
| General management & consulting | 25 | 5% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Sales | 16 | 3% | 2 | 0% | Kyriba |
| Software engineering | 12 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 6 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Kyriba →
Companies using SAP Group Reporting →
fpa treasury close ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP Group Reporting is named by 124 companies in job postings and Kyriba by 178; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/kyriba-vs-sap-group-reporting)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Kyriba vs SAP Group Reporting: questions
Which is more used, Kyriba or SAP Group Reporting?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Kyriba (178) over SAP Group Reporting (124). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAP Group Reporting (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Kyriba?
9% of Kyriba companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 19% for SAP Group Reporting. 67% of Kyriba companies have over 1,000 employees, against 67% for SAP Group Reporting.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Kyriba in marketing and SAP Group Reporting in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Kyriba or SAP Group Reporting. Start free, no card.