Kyriba VS CCH Tagetik
As of 30 October 2026, CCH Tagetik is named by 158 companies and Kyriba by 178; Kyriba skews to companies under 200 people (9% vs 18%), CCH Tagetik to companies over 1,000 (63% vs 67%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Kyriba's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, CCH Tagetik rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Kyriba: 2–200 employees
- 9%
- CCH Tagetik: 2–200 employees
- 18%
- Kyriba: 1,000+ employees
- 67%
- CCH Tagetik: 1,000+ employees
- 63%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Kyriba | share | CCH Tagetik | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 5 | 3% | 13 | 8% | CCH Tagetik |
| 51-200 employees | 10 | 6% | 13 | 8% | CCH Tagetik |
| 201-500 employees | 23 | 13% | 18 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 18 | 10% | 11 | 7% | Kyriba |
| 1001-5000 employees | 46 | 26% | 45 | 28% | CCH Tagetik |
| 5001-10000 employees | 23 | 13% | 24 | 15% | CCH Tagetik |
| 10,001+ employees | 50 | 28% | 31 | 20% | Kyriba |
| Segment | Kyriba | share | CCH Tagetik | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 58 | 33% | 36 | 23% | Kyriba |
| Technology & software | 35 | 20% | 19 | 12% | Kyriba |
| Manufacturing & industry | 28 | 16% | 50 | 32% | CCH Tagetik |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 11 | 6% | 11 | 7% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 10 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 9 | 5% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 8 | 4% | 3 | 2% | Kyriba |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 3% | 18 | 11% | CCH Tagetik |
| Health care | 5 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Kyriba | share | CCH Tagetik | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 95 | 53% | 41 | 26% | Kyriba |
| France | 27 | 15% | 15 | 9% | Kyriba |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 13% | 17 | 11% | Kyriba |
| Germany | 6 | 3% | 23 | 15% | CCH Tagetik |
| Canada | 4 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Italy | 3 | 2% | 17 | 11% | CCH Tagetik |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 7 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Kyriba | share | CCH Tagetik | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 273 | 50% | 254 | 52% | CCH Tagetik |
| IT operations & business systems | 104 | 19% | 61 | 12% | Kyriba |
| Product, program & project management | 39 | 7% | 7 | 1% | Kyriba |
| General management & consulting | 25 | 5% | 62 | 13% | CCH Tagetik |
| Sales | 16 | 3% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Software engineering | 12 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 6 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Kyriba →
Companies using CCH Tagetik →
fpa treasury close ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
CCH Tagetik is named by 158 companies in job postings and Kyriba by 178; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/kyriba-vs-tagetik)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Kyriba vs CCH Tagetik: questions
Which is more used, Kyriba or CCH Tagetik?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Kyriba (178) over CCH Tagetik (158). By website-and-DNS footprint, CCH Tagetik (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Kyriba?
9% of Kyriba companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 18% for CCH Tagetik. 67% of Kyriba companies have over 1,000 employees, against 63% for CCH Tagetik.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Kyriba in marketing and CCH Tagetik in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Kyriba or CCH Tagetik. Start free, no card.