Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · applicant tracking

Lever VS Workable

As of 4 November 2026, Workable is named by 146 companies and Lever by 213; Lever skews to companies under 200 people (59% vs 56%), Workable to companies over 1,000 (12% vs 15%).

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Lever's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Workable rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Lever: 2–200 employees
59%
Workable: 2–200 employees
56%
Lever: 1,000+ employees
15%
Workable: 1,000+ employees
12%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.3 · 1.5
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
213companies name Lever
146companies name Workable
15name both
281 · 222postings in 90 days, Lever · Workable
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentLevershareWorkableshareLeans
Self-employed94%107%Workable
2-10 employees3717%139%Lever
11-50 employees4220%3323%Workable
51-200 employees4722%3625%Workable
201-500 employees3014%2114%even
501-1000 employees157%1611%Workable
1001-5000 employees2110%139%even
5001-10000 employees52%11%even
10,001+ employees73%32%even
By industry
SegmentLevershareWorkableshareLeans
Technology & software9243%3725%Lever
Business & finance services4019%3323%Workable
Manufacturing & industry2713%2215%Workable
Media & content115%64%even
Consumer services & leisure105%118%Workable
Public, community & associations84%11%Lever
Commerce & trade73%128%Workable
Health care63%96%Workable
Utilities & infrastructure42%32%even
Property & construction31%75%Workable
Transport, logistics & rental21%––outside top 12
Agriculture & forestry10%11%even
Hospitality & travel––43%outside top 12
By country
SegmentLevershareWorkableshareLeans
United States16477%8458%Lever
India84%32%even
United Kingdom73%1611%Workable
Canada42%75%Workable
Brazil21%––outside top 12
Germany21%11%even
France21%21%even
United Arab Emirates10%––outside top 12
Australia10%75%Workable
Bulgaria10%––outside top 12
Switzerland10%21%even
Colombia10%––outside top 12
Greece––43%outside top 12
Singapore––32%outside top 12
PH––21%outside top 12
Cyprus––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentLevershareWorkableshareLeans
Human resources29970%21779%Workable
Sales215%10%Lever
Software engineering92%124%Workable
Unclassified82%10%even
Customer service & success51%––outside top 12
Data & AI41%73%even
IT operations & business systems41%31%even
Product, program & project management41%31%even
Administration & office31%62%even
Business development & strategy31%21%even
Engineering (non-software)20%41%even
Finance & accounting20%10%even
Legal, compliance & risk20%––outside top 12
Agriculture and environment10%––outside top 12
Design & UX10%––outside top 12
Education & training10%––outside top 12
General management & consulting10%31%even
Healthcare clinical10%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications10%––outside top 12
Procurement and purchasing––21%outside top 12
Hospitality and food service––10%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Workable is named by 146 companies in job postings and Lever by 213; 15 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/lever-vs-workable)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Lever vs Workable: questions

Which is more used, Lever or Workable?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Lever (213) over Workable (146). By website-and-DNS footprint, Workable (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Lever?

59% of Lever companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 56% for Workable. 15% of Lever companies have over 1,000 employees, against 12% for Workable.

Do companies run both?

15 companies name both in their postings, usually Lever in marketing and Workable in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Lever or Workable. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market