Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · fpa treasury close

SAP Group Reporting VS CCH Tagetik

As of 30 October 2026, CCH Tagetik is named by 158 companies and SAP Group Reporting by 124; SAP Group Reporting skews to companies under 200 people (19% vs 18%), CCH Tagetik to companies over 1,000 (63% vs 67%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: SAP Group Reporting's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, CCH Tagetik rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

SAP Group Reporting: 2–200 employees
19%
CCH Tagetik: 2–200 employees
18%
SAP Group Reporting: 1,000+ employees
67%
CCH Tagetik: 1,000+ employees
63%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.3 · 2.4
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
124companies name SAP Group Reporting
158companies name CCH Tagetik
20name both
412 · 373postings in 90 days, SAP Group Reporting · CCH Tagetik
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentSAP Group ReportingshareCCH TagetikshareLeans
2-10 employees22%32%even
11-50 employees65%138%CCH Tagetik
51-200 employees1613%138%SAP Group Reporting
201-500 employees76%1811%CCH Tagetik
501-1000 employees108%117%even
1001-5000 employees3226%4528%CCH Tagetik
5001-10000 employees1411%2415%CCH Tagetik
10,001+ employees3730%3120%SAP Group Reporting
By industry
SegmentSAP Group ReportingshareCCH TagetikshareLeans
Manufacturing & industry4738%5032%SAP Group Reporting
Business & finance services2520%3623%CCH Tagetik
Technology & software2016%1912%SAP Group Reporting
Utilities & infrastructure97%117%even
Automotive43%32%even
Commerce & trade43%1811%CCH Tagetik
Transport, logistics & rental43%––outside top 12
Consumer services & leisure32%32%even
Property & construction32%53%even
Hospitality & travel22%11%even
Media & content22%32%even
Health care11%43%even
Public, community & associations––43%outside top 12
By country
SegmentSAP Group ReportingshareCCH TagetikshareLeans
United States5746%4126%SAP Group Reporting
Germany1714%2315%even
United Kingdom1512%1711%even
Switzerland54%43%even
France54%159%CCH Tagetik
India43%––outside top 12
Netherlands43%74%even
Brazil22%––outside top 12
Canada22%32%even
Italy22%1711%CCH Tagetik
Argentina11%––outside top 12
Australia11%43%even
Austria––32%outside top 12
Singapore––32%outside top 12
Belgium––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentSAP Group ReportingshareCCH TagetikshareLeans
IT operations & business systems26854%6112%SAP Group Reporting
Finance & accounting10622%25452%CCH Tagetik
General management & consulting143%6213%CCH Tagetik
Product, program & project management61%71%even
Data & AI31%102%even
Sales20%82%even
Software engineering20%20%even
Unclassified20%––outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––31%outside top 12
Construction and civil––10%outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)––10%outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk––10%outside top 12
Marketing & communications––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

CCH Tagetik is named by 158 companies in job postings and SAP Group Reporting by 124; 20 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/sap-group-reporting-vs-tagetik)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

SAP Group Reporting vs CCH Tagetik: questions

Which is more used, SAP Group Reporting or CCH Tagetik?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, CCH Tagetik (158) over SAP Group Reporting (124). By website-and-DNS footprint, CCH Tagetik (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses SAP Group Reporting?

19% of SAP Group Reporting companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 18% for CCH Tagetik. 67% of SAP Group Reporting companies have over 1,000 employees, against 63% for CCH Tagetik.

Do companies run both?

20 companies name both in their postings, usually SAP Group Reporting in marketing and CCH Tagetik in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on SAP Group Reporting or CCH Tagetik. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market