CCH Tagetik VS Workiva
As of 30 October 2026, Workiva is named by 341 companies and CCH Tagetik by 158; CCH Tagetik skews to companies under 200 people (18% vs 17%), Workiva to companies over 1,000 (57% vs 63%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CCH Tagetik's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Workiva rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CCH Tagetik: 2–200 employees
- 18%
- Workiva: 2–200 employees
- 17%
- CCH Tagetik: 1,000+ employees
- 63%
- Workiva: 1,000+ employees
- 57%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.4 · 2.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CCH Tagetik | share | Workiva | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 3 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 13 | 8% | 14 | 4% | CCH Tagetik |
| 51-200 employees | 13 | 8% | 35 | 10% | Workiva |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 11% | 45 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 11 | 7% | 43 | 13% | Workiva |
| 1001-5000 employees | 45 | 28% | 88 | 26% | CCH Tagetik |
| 5001-10000 employees | 24 | 15% | 32 | 9% | CCH Tagetik |
| 10,001+ employees | 31 | 20% | 74 | 22% | Workiva |
| Self-employed | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CCH Tagetik | share | Workiva | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 50 | 32% | 78 | 23% | CCH Tagetik |
| Business & finance services | 36 | 23% | 107 | 31% | Workiva |
| Technology & software | 19 | 12% | 54 | 16% | Workiva |
| Commerce & trade | 18 | 11% | 16 | 5% | CCH Tagetik |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 11 | 7% | 21 | 6% | even |
| Property & construction | 5 | 3% | 16 | 5% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 3% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 4 | 3% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 3 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Segment | CCH Tagetik | share | Workiva | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 26% | 275 | 81% | Workiva |
| Germany | 23 | 15% | 6 | 2% | CCH Tagetik |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 11% | 19 | 6% | CCH Tagetik |
| Italy | 17 | 11% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 15 | 9% | 4 | 1% | CCH Tagetik |
| Netherlands | 7 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 4 | 3% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% | 1 | 0% | CCH Tagetik |
| Austria | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 3 | 2% | 14 | 4% | Workiva |
| Singapore | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Bulgaria | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Estonia | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CCH Tagetik | share | Workiva | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 254 | 52% | 539 | 60% | Workiva |
| General management & consulting | 62 | 13% | 26 | 3% | CCH Tagetik |
| IT operations & business systems | 61 | 12% | 53 | 6% | CCH Tagetik |
| Data & AI | 10 | 2% | 65 | 7% | Workiva |
| Sales | 8 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 7 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 3 | 1% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Software engineering | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | 51 | 6% | Workiva |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CCH Tagetik →
Companies using Workiva →
fpa treasury close ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Workiva is named by 341 companies in job postings and CCH Tagetik by 158; 11 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/tagetik-vs-workiva)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CCH Tagetik vs Workiva: questions
Which is more used, CCH Tagetik or Workiva?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Workiva (341) over CCH Tagetik (158). By website-and-DNS footprint, Workiva (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CCH Tagetik?
18% of CCH Tagetik companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 17% for Workiva. 63% of CCH Tagetik companies have over 1,000 employees, against 57% for Workiva.
Do companies run both?
11 companies name both in their postings, usually CCH Tagetik in marketing and Workiva in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CCH Tagetik or Workiva. Start free, no card.