AMQP alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 message brokers streaming are named by companies instead of AMQP: Apache Kafka by 6,262 companies, RabbitMQ by 2,560, Amazon SQS by 1,798.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- AMQP, companies in postings
- 159
- Most used alternative
- Apache Kafka · 6,262
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Apache Kafka
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
message brokers streaming companies choose instead of AMQP
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs AMQP | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apache KafkaApache Software Foundation | 6,262 | 3938% | 25,230 | AMQP vs Apache Kafka → | |
| 2 | RabbitMQBroadcom | 2,560 | 1610% | 6,200 | AMQP vs RabbitMQ → | |
| 3 | Amazon SQSAmazon Web Services | 1,798 | 1131% | 3,909 | AMQP vs Amazon SQS → | |
| 4 | Azure Service BusMicrosoft | 1,064 | 669% | 3,042 | AMQP vs Azure Service Bus → | |
| 5 | Amazon SNSAmazon | 1,041 | 655% | 2,339 | AMQP vs Amazon SNS → | |
| 6 | Amazon KinesisAmazon | 961 | 604% | 2,185 | AMQP vs Amazon Kinesis → | |
| 7 | Google Cloud Pub/SubGoogle | 912 | 574% | 2,446 | AMQP vs Google Cloud Pub/Sub → | |
| 8 | IBM MQIBM | 680 | 428% | 2,550 | AMQP vs IBM MQ → | |
| 9 | Java Message ServiceEclipse Foundation | 602 | 379% | 1,455 | AMQP vs Java Message Service → | |
| 10 | Amazon EventBridgeAmazon Web Services | 543 | 342% | 1,242 | AMQP vs Amazon EventBridge → | |
| 11 | Azure Event HubsMicrosoft | 525 | 330% | 1,243 | AMQP vs Azure Event Hubs → | |
| 12 | CeleryCelery | 473 | 297% | 862 | AMQP vs Celery → | |
| 13 | Apache ActiveMQApache Software Foundation | 343 | 216% | 704 | AMQP vs Apache ActiveMQ → | |
| 14 | Amazon MSKAmazon Web Services | 331 | 208% | 812 | AMQP vs Amazon MSK → | |
| 15 | NATSSynadia | 267 | 168% | 523 | AMQP vs NATS → | |
| 16 | Azure Event GridMicrosoft | 262 | 165% | 676 | AMQP vs Azure Event Grid → | |
| 17 | Apache PulsarApache Software Foundation | 169 | 106% | 560 | AMQP vs Apache Pulsar → | |
| 18 | ConfluentConfluent | 144 | 91% | 529 | AMQP vs Confluent → | |
| 19 | SidekiqContributed Systems | 129 | 81% | 195 | soon | |
| 20 | 112 | 70% | 366 | soon | ||
| 21 | BullMQTaskforce.sh | 105 | 66% | 122 | soon | |
| 22 | ZeroMQZeroMQ community | 100 | 63% | 190 | soon | |
| 23 | Confluent Schema RegistryConfluent | 92 | 58% | 205 | soon | |
| 24 | RedpandaRedpanda Data | 88 | 55% | 304 | soon | |
| 25 | SolaceSolace | 83 | 52% | 643 | soon | |
| 26 | Apache ActiveMQ ArtemisApache Software Foundation | 74 | 47% | 197 | soon | |
| 27 | Microsoft Message QueuingMicrosoft | 43 | 27% | 88 | soon | |
| 28 | MassTransitMassTransit | 40 | 25% | 75 | soon | |
| 29 | NATS JetStreamSynadia | 40 | 25% | 95 | soon | |
| 30 | Confluent CloudConfluent | 37 | 23% | 73 | soon | |
| 31 | Google Cloud TasksGoogle | 30 | 19% | 52 | soon | |
| 32 | AMPS60East Technologies | 28 | 18% | 82 | soon | |
| 33 | Confluent PlatformConfluent | 27 | 17% | 82 | soon | |
| 34 | TIBCO RendezvousTIBCO | 27 | 17% | 76 | soon | |
| 35 | AeronReal Logic | 25 | 16% | 114 | soon | |
| 36 | TIBCO EMSTIBCO | 24 | 15% | 118 | soon | |
| 37 | Amazon MQAmazon | 21 | 13% | 42 | soon | |
| 38 | HiveMQHiveMQ | 18 | 11% | 45 | soon | |
| 39 | SAP Advanced Event MeshSAP | 18 | 11% | 55 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on AMQP users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 message brokers streaming are named by companies instead of AMQP: Apache Kafka by 6,262 companies, RabbitMQ by 2,560, Amazon SQS by 1,798, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/amqp/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
AMQP alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to AMQP?
Apache Kafka: 6,262 companies name it in their own job postings, against 159 for AMQP.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on AMQP
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.