AWS Transit Gateway alternatives
As of 5 November 2026, 39 routing switching wireless are named by companies instead of AWS Transit Gateway: Cisco by 4,699 companies, Juniper Networks by 1,000, Cisco Meraki by 867.
As of 5 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- AWS Transit Gateway, companies in postings
- 295
- Most used alternative
- Cisco · 4,699
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Cisco
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
routing switching wireless companies choose instead of AWS Transit Gateway
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs AWS Transit Gateway | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CiscoCisco | 4,699 | 1593% | 19,470 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Cisco → | |
| 2 | Juniper NetworksJuniper Networks | 1,000 | 339% | 3,650 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Juniper Networks → | |
| 3 | Cisco MerakiCisco | 867 | 294% | 1,674 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Cisco Meraki → | |
| 4 | 793 | 269% | 2,162 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Aruba Networks → | ||
| 5 | Cisco CatalystCisco | 467 | 158% | 1,412 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Cisco Catalyst → | |
| 6 | Cisco ACICisco | 430 | 146% | 1,307 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Cisco ACI → | |
| 7 | AristaArista Networks | 411 | 139% | 1,268 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Arista → | |
| 8 | Cisco ASRCisco | 269 | 91% | 492 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Cisco ASR → | |
| 9 | Ubiquiti UniFiUbiquiti | 249 | 84% | 463 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Ubiquiti UniFi → | |
| 10 | Cisco IOSCisco | 233 | 79% | 533 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Cisco IOS → | |
| 11 | UbiquitiUbiquiti Inc. | 225 | 76% | 344 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Ubiquiti → | |
| 12 | Cisco NexusCisco | 209 | 71% | 527 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Cisco Nexus → | |
| 13 | Cisco NX-OSCisco | 166 | 56% | 345 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Cisco NX-OS → | |
| 14 | 164 | 56% | 520 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Cisco Catalyst Center → | ||
| 15 | MikroTikMikroTik | 149 | 51% | 223 | AWS Transit Gateway vs MikroTik → | |
| 16 | Junos OSJuniper Networks | 143 | 48% | 470 | AWS Transit Gateway vs Junos OS → | |
| 17 | BrocadeBroadcom | 136 | 46% | 325 | soon | |
| 18 | Ruckus NetworksCommScope | 117 | 40% | 215 | soon | |
| 19 | Amazon VPCAmazon | 97 | 33% | 237 | soon | |
| 20 | Cisco IOS XECisco | 91 | 31% | 391 | soon | |
| 21 | Cisco SD-WANCisco | 90 | 31% | 270 | soon | |
| 22 | Versa NetworksVersa Networks | 81 | 27% | 478 | soon | |
| 23 | Extreme NetworksExtreme Networks | 80 | 27% | 143 | soon | |
| 24 | CienaCiena | 76 | 26% | 243 | soon | |
| 25 | SONiCLinux Foundation | 73 | 25% | 405 | soon | |
| 26 | Cumulus LinuxNVIDIA | 63 | 21% | 250 | soon | |
| 27 | 58 | 20% | 184 | soon | ||
| 28 | Arista EOSArista Networks | 57 | 19% | 100 | soon | |
| 29 | VeloCloudVMware | 53 | 18% | 153 | soon | |
| 30 | Cisco IOS XRCisco | 52 | 18% | 167 | soon | |
| 31 | MellanoxNVIDIA | 45 | 15% | 183 | soon | |
| 32 | FortiSwitchFortinet | 44 | 15% | 68 | soon | |
| 33 | AdtranAdtran | 41 | 14% | 91 | soon | |
| 34 | CalixCalix | 39 | 13% | 73 | soon | |
| 35 | FRRoutingLinux Foundation | 39 | 13% | 73 | soon | |
| 36 | Azure Virtual WANMicrosoft | 37 | 13% | 72 | soon | |
| 37 | LANCOM SystemsLANCOM Systems | 35 | 12% | 43 | soon | |
| 38 | Fortinet FortiAPFortinet | 33 | 11% | 53 | soon | |
| 39 | HirschmannBelden | 30 | 10% | 69 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on AWS Transit Gateway users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 routing switching wireless are named by companies instead of AWS Transit Gateway: Cisco by 4,699 companies, Juniper Networks by 1,000, Cisco Meraki by 867, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 5 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/aws-transit-gateway/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
AWS Transit Gateway alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to AWS Transit Gateway?
Cisco: 4,699 companies name it in their own job postings, against 295 for AWS Transit Gateway.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on AWS Transit Gateway
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.