Start free
Tools · Category

routing switching wireless, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, Cisco leads routing switching wireless with 4,677 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Juniper Networks at 988.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
Cisco · 4,677
Runner-up
Juniper Networks · 988
Most hiring, 90 days
Cisco
Highest postings per company
Versa Networks
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
12,148companies across the category
39%of them on Cisco
39,525postings naming a routing switching wireles in 90 days
40tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every routing switching wireles we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
CiscoCisco
4,677
19,4034.1
2
Juniper NetworksJuniper Networks
988
3,6423.7
3
Cisco MerakiCisco
860
1,6551.9
4
Aruba NetworksHPE
790
2,1412.7
5
Cisco CatalystCisco
467
1,3873.0
6
Cisco ACICisco
430
1,3053.0
7
AristaArista Networks
406
1,2683.1
8
AWS Transit GatewayAmazon
297
5972.0
9
Cisco ASRCisco
267
4861.8
10
Ubiquiti UniFiUbiquiti
246
4581.9
11
Cisco IOSCisco
230
5362.3
12
UbiquitiUbiquiti Inc.
222
3341.5
13
Cisco NexusCisco
207
5212.5
14
Cisco NX-OSCisco
166
3462.1
15
Cisco Catalyst CenterCisco
159
5133.2
16
MikroTikMikroTik
147
2231.5
17
Junos OSJuniper Networks
142
4753.3
18
BrocadeBroadcom
134
3192.4
19
Ruckus NetworksCommScope
116
2131.8
20
Amazon VPCAmazon
97
2352.4
21
Cisco IOS XECisco
89
3824.3
22
Cisco SD-WANCisco
88
2713.1
23
Versa NetworksVersa Networks
81
4755.9
24
Extreme NetworksExtreme Networks
78
1451.9
25
CienaCiena
76
2383.1
26
SONiCLinux Foundation
72
4045.6
27
Cumulus LinuxNVIDIA
62
2443.9
28
Arista EOSArista Networks
57
1051.8
29
Aruba CentralHPE
56
1823.3
30
Cisco IOS XRCisco
52
1643.2
31
VeloCloudVMware
52
1482.8
32
MellanoxNVIDIA
44
1784.0
33
FortiSwitchFortinet
43
691.6
34
AdtranAdtran
41
882.1
35
CalixCalix
39
701.8
36
FRRoutingLinux Foundation
38
691.8
37
Azure Virtual WANMicrosoft
36
742.1
38
LANCOM SystemsLANCOM Systems
35
421.2
39
Fortinet FortiAPFortinet
32
531.7
40
HirschmannBelden
29
672.3
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

Cisco vs Juniper Networks4,677 · 988Cisco vs Cisco Meraki4,677 · 860Cisco vs Aruba Networks4,677 · 790Cisco vs Cisco Catalyst4,677 · 467Cisco vs Cisco ACI4,677 · 430Juniper Networks vs Cisco Meraki988 · 860Juniper Networks vs Aruba Networks988 · 790Juniper Networks vs Cisco Catalyst988 · 467Juniper Networks vs Cisco ACI988 · 430Cisco Meraki vs Aruba Networks860 · 790Cisco Meraki vs Cisco Catalyst860 · 467Cisco Meraki vs Cisco ACI860 · 430Aruba Networks vs Cisco Catalyst790 · 467Aruba Networks vs Cisco ACI790 · 430Cisco Catalyst vs Cisco ACI467 · 430
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Cisco leads routing switching wireless with 4,677 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of Juniper Networks at 988. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/routing-switching-wireless)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

routing switching wireless: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

Start free with 1,000 records
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free