Aruba Networks VS Cisco Catalyst_
As of 4 November 2026, Cisco Catalyst is named by 467 companies and Aruba Networks by 790; Aruba Networks skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 31%), Cisco Catalyst to companies over 1,000 (49% vs 41%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Aruba Networks's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Cisco Catalyst rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Aruba Networks: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- Cisco Catalyst: 2–200 employees
- 31%
- Aruba Networks: 1,000+ employees
- 41%
- Cisco Catalyst: 1,000+ employees
- 49%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 3.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Aruba Networks | share | Cisco Catalyst | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 9 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 42 | 5% | 29 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 86 | 11% | 52 | 11% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 147 | 19% | 66 | 14% | Aruba Networks |
| 201-500 employees | 104 | 13% | 45 | 10% | Aruba Networks |
| 501-1000 employees | 79 | 10% | 40 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 160 | 20% | 95 | 20% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 55 | 7% | 41 | 9% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 108 | 14% | 94 | 20% | Cisco Catalyst |
| Segment | Aruba Networks | share | Cisco Catalyst | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 283 | 36% | 152 | 33% | Aruba Networks |
| Manufacturing & industry | 134 | 17% | 65 | 14% | Aruba Networks |
| Business & finance services | 96 | 12% | 94 | 20% | Cisco Catalyst |
| Commerce & trade | 44 | 6% | 23 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 41 | 5% | 19 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 37 | 5% | 21 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 32 | 4% | 19 | 4% | even |
| Health care | 31 | 4% | 42 | 9% | Cisco Catalyst |
| Property & construction | 25 | 3% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 20 | 3% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 18 | 2% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 15 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Aruba Networks | share | Cisco Catalyst | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 383 | 48% | 311 | 67% | Cisco Catalyst |
| Germany | 86 | 11% | 10 | 2% | Aruba Networks |
| France | 40 | 5% | 12 | 3% | Aruba Networks |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 5% | 31 | 7% | even |
| Canada | 19 | 2% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 19 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| India | 17 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 16 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 14 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 12 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Aruba Networks | share | Cisco Catalyst | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 1,815 | 66% | 835 | 49% | Aruba Networks |
| Sales | 298 | 11% | 42 | 2% | Aruba Networks |
| Engineering (non-software) | 90 | 3% | 36 | 2% | even |
| Customer service & success | 70 | 3% | 55 | 3% | even |
| Software engineering | 54 | 2% | 168 | 10% | Cisco Catalyst |
| Product, program & project management | 35 | 1% | 26 | 2% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 21 | 1% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 19 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 10 | 0% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 8 | 0% | 30 | 2% | even |
| General management & consulting | 8 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| procurement and purchasing | 6 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 5 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 5 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 5 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 3 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| healthcare clinical | 3 | 0% | 46 | 3% | Cisco Catalyst |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 0% | 7 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| hospitality and food service | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | 33 | 2% | even |
| social care and community | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Travel, leisure & events | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| agriculture and environment | – | – | 85 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| healthcare support and caregiving | – | – | 57 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 12 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Aruba Networks →
Companies using Cisco Catalyst →
routing switching wireless ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Cisco Catalyst is named by 467 companies in job postings and Aruba Networks by 790; 96 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/aruba-networks-vs-cisco-catalyst)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Aruba Networks vs Cisco Catalyst: questions
Which is more used, Aruba Networks or Cisco Catalyst?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Aruba Networks (790) over Cisco Catalyst (467). By website-and-DNS footprint, Cisco Catalyst (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Aruba Networks?
35% of Aruba Networks companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 31% for Cisco Catalyst. 41% of Aruba Networks companies have over 1,000 employees, against 49% for Cisco Catalyst.
Do companies run both?
96 companies name both in their postings, usually Aruba Networks in marketing and Cisco Catalyst in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Aruba Networks or Cisco Catalyst, and get 1,000 records free.