Bitbucket Pipelines alternatives
As of 5 November 2026, 39 ci cd are named by companies instead of Bitbucket Pipelines: Jenkins by 6,495 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,134, GitLab CI/CD by 3,664.
As of 5 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Bitbucket Pipelines, companies in postings
- 184
- Most used alternative
- Jenkins · 6,495
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Jenkins
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
ci cd companies choose instead of Bitbucket Pipelines
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Bitbucket Pipelines | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JenkinsContinuous Delivery Foundation | 6,495 | 3530% | 27,621 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Jenkins → | |
| 2 | GitHub ActionsMicrosoft | 6,134 | 3334% | 16,980 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs GitHub Actions → | |
| 3 | GitLab CI/CDGitLab | 3,664 | 1991% | 11,582 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs GitLab CI/CD → | |
| 4 | Argo CDCloud Native Computing Foundation | 2,409 | 1309% | 5,975 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Argo CD → | |
| 5 | CircleCICircleCI | 671 | 365% | 1,283 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs CircleCI → | |
| 6 | Azure PipelinesMicrosoft | 554 | 301% | 1,157 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Azure Pipelines → | |
| 7 | Atlassian BambooAtlassian | 527 | 286% | 1,308 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Atlassian Bamboo → | |
| 8 | TeamCityJetBrains | 381 | 207% | 1,164 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs TeamCity → | |
| 9 | AWS CodePipelineAmazon Web Services | 364 | 198% | 679 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs AWS CodePipeline → | |
| 10 | fastlanefastlane | 271 | 147% | 559 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs fastlane → | |
| 11 | CopadoCopado | 264 | 143% | 666 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Copado → | |
| 12 | Salesforce DXSalesforce | 263 | 143% | 509 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Salesforce DX → | |
| 13 | HarnessHarness | 227 | 123% | 1,075 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Harness → | |
| 14 | GearsetGearset | 214 | 116% | 402 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Gearset → | |
| 15 | Google Cloud BuildGoogle | 206 | 112% | 609 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Google Cloud Build → | |
| 16 | Octopus DeployOctopus Deploy | 192 | 104% | 388 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Octopus Deploy → | |
| 17 | Flux CDCNCF | 179 | 97% | 343 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Flux CD → | |
| 18 | AWS CodeBuildAmazon | 175 | 95% | 312 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs AWS CodeBuild → | |
| 19 | BitriseBitrise | 173 | 94% | 275 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Bitrise → | |
| 20 | TestFlightApple | 156 | 85% | 234 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs TestFlight → | |
| 21 | Travis CITravis CI | 131 | 71% | 1,130 | Bitbucket Pipelines vs Travis CI → | |
| 22 | BuildkiteBuildkite | 121 | 66% | 317 | soon | |
| 23 | 121 | 66% | 375 | soon | ||
| 24 | AWS CodeDeployAmazon Web Services | 111 | 60% | 182 | soon | |
| 25 | TektonContinuous Delivery Foundation | 107 | 58% | 656 | soon | |
| 26 | SpinnakerSpinnaker | 104 | 57% | 317 | soon | |
| 27 | AtlantisAtlantis (Runatlantis) | 70 | 38% | 127 | soon | |
| 28 | Concourse CIConcourse | 70 | 38% | 153 | soon | |
| 29 | CloudBeesCloudBees | 62 | 34% | 184 | soon | |
| 30 | XL ReleaseDigital.ai | 54 | 29% | 210 | soon | |
| 31 | CodemagicNevercode | 36 | 20% | 39 | soon | |
| 32 | UrbanCode DeployIBM | 35 | 19% | 159 | soon | |
| 33 | XL DeployDigital.ai | 33 | 18% | 113 | soon | |
| 34 | GitLab RunnerGitLab | 32 | 17% | 73 | soon | |
| 35 | KargoAkuity | 29 | 16% | 78 | soon | |
| 36 | AutoRABITAutoRABIT | 27 | 15% | 81 | soon | |
| 37 | ScrewdriverYahoo | 27 | 15% | 80 | soon | |
| 38 | FlosumFlosum | 23 | 13% | 53 | soon | |
| 39 | CruiseControlThoughtWorks | 22 | 12% | 8 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Bitbucket Pipelines users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 ci cd are named by companies instead of Bitbucket Pipelines: Jenkins by 6,495 companies, GitHub Actions by 6,134, GitLab CI/CD by 3,664, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 5 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/bitbucket-pipelines/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Bitbucket Pipelines alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Bitbucket Pipelines?
Jenkins: 6,495 companies name it in their own job postings, against 184 for Bitbucket Pipelines.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Bitbucket Pipelines
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.