Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · iot platforms protocols · Alternatives

Bluetooth alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 iot platforms protocols are named by companies instead of Bluetooth: Modbus by 2,067 companies, CAN bus by 1,760, SPI by 1,559.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Bluetooth, companies in postings
346
Most used alternative
Modbus · 2,067
Fastest hiring, 90 days
Modbus
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

iot platforms protocols companies choose instead of Bluetooth

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs Bluetoothpostings, 90 dCompare
1
ModbusModbus Organization
2,067597%5,698Bluetooth vs Modbus →
2
CAN busISO
1,760509%5,610Bluetooth vs CAN bus →
3
SPIMotorola
1,559451%4,935Bluetooth vs SPI →
4
I2CNXP
1,515438%4,820Bluetooth vs I2C →
5
UART(industry standard)
1,237358%3,224Bluetooth vs UART →
6
MQTTOASIS
1,201347%2,656Bluetooth vs MQTT →
7
EtherNet/IPODVA
1,048303%2,374Bluetooth vs EtherNet/IP →
8
OPC UAOPC Foundation
935270%2,090Bluetooth vs OPC UA →
9
PROFINETPROFIBUS & PROFINET International
914264%2,036Bluetooth vs PROFINET →
10
PROFIBUSPROFIBUS & PROFINET International
701203%1,645Bluetooth vs PROFIBUS →
11
BACnetASHRAE
598173%1,743Bluetooth vs BACnet →
12
USBUSB Implementers Forum
597173%1,786Bluetooth vs USB →
13
Bluetooth Low EnergyBluetooth SIG
473137%934Bluetooth vs Bluetooth Low Energy →
14
RS-485TIA
464134%1,001Bluetooth vs RS-485 →
15
OPC (OPC UA)OPC Foundation
451130%1,193Bluetooth vs OPC (OPC UA) →
16
RS-232EIA
446129%1,038Bluetooth vs RS-232 →
17
KNXKNX Association
401116%703Bluetooth vs KNX →
18
EtherCATEtherCAT Technology Group
378109%884Bluetooth vs EtherCAT →
19
IEC 61850IEC
32494%1,126Bluetooth vs IEC 61850 →
20
DNP3IEEE
32193%895Bluetooth vs DNP3 →
21
DeviceNetODVA
28582%598Bluetooth vs DeviceNet →
22
DDS (Data Distribution Service)Object Management Group
28081%663Bluetooth vs DDS (Data Distribution Service) →
23
LIN BusLIN Consortium
26677%1,210Bluetooth vs LIN Bus →
24
CAN FDBosch
18152%545Bluetooth vs CAN FD →
25
RS-422TIA/EIA
18052%607Bluetooth vs RS-422 →
26
SAE J1939SAE International
17952%468Bluetooth vs SAE J1939 →
27
ZigbeeConnectivity Standards Alliance
17952%427Bluetooth vs Zigbee →
28
UDS (ISO 14229)ISO
17551%552Bluetooth vs UDS (ISO 14229) →
29
GPIO
16849%380Bluetooth vs GPIO →
30
CANopenCAN in Automation
16247%293Bluetooth vs CANopen →
31
NFCNFC Forum
14742%366Bluetooth vs NFC →
32
DMX512USITT
12235%150soon
33
LonWorksEchelon
11533%403soon
34
ARINCSAE ITT
11433%492soon
35
EcoStruxureSchneider Electric
10932%339soon
36
LoRaWANLoRa Alliance
10831%185soon
37
Azure IoT HubMicrosoft
10029%162soon
38
DALIDiiA
9929%154soon
39
HART ProtocolFieldComm Group
9929%265soon
20,804 companies name a iot platforms protocol in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on Bluetooth users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Get the full list Watch this category

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 iot platforms protocols are named by companies instead of Bluetooth: Modbus by 2,067 companies, CAN bus by 1,760, SPI by 1,559, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/bluetooth/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

Bluetooth alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to Bluetooth?

Modbus: 2,067 companies name it in their own job postings, against 346 for Bluetooth.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on Bluetooth
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

Start free
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market