ETABS alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 structural engineering are named by companies instead of ETABS: CSI SAFE by 560 companies, STAAD.Pro by 460, Tekla by 417.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- ETABS, companies in postings
- 311
- Most used alternative
- CSI SAFE · 560
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- CSI SAFE
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
structural engineering companies choose instead of ETABS
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs ETABS | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSI SAFEComputers and Structures Inc. | 560 | 180% | 1,919 | ETABS vs CSI SAFE → | |
| 2 | STAAD.ProBentley Systems | 460 | 148% | 1,603 | ETABS vs STAAD.Pro → | |
| 3 | TeklaTrimble | 417 | 134% | 968 | ETABS vs Tekla → | |
| 4 | SAP2000CSI (Computers and Structures) | 326 | 105% | 1,306 | ETABS vs SAP2000 → | |
| 5 | RISARISA Tech | 298 | 96% | 852 | ETABS vs RISA → | |
| 6 | Tekla StructuresTrimble | 199 | 64% | 429 | ETABS vs Tekla Structures → | |
| 7 | MidasMIDAS Information Technology | 197 | 63% | 644 | ETABS vs Midas → | |
| 8 | PLAXISBentley Systems | 163 | 52% | 548 | ETABS vs PLAXIS → | |
| 9 | LPILEEnsoft | 160 | 51% | 761 | ETABS vs LPILE → | |
| 10 | RISA-3DRISA (Nemetschek) | 159 | 51% | 468 | ETABS vs RISA-3D → | |
| 11 | MDXMDX Software | 156 | 50% | 334 | ETABS vs MDX → | |
| 12 | Dlubal RFEMDlubal Software | 125 | 40% | 203 | ETABS vs Dlubal RFEM → | |
| 13 | Autodesk Advance SteelAutodesk | 111 | 36% | 250 | soon | |
| 14 | ENERCALCEnercalc | 107 | 34% | 260 | soon | |
| 15 | SCIA EngineerNemetschek | 98 | 32% | 192 | soon | |
| 16 | GeoStudioSeequent | 95 | 31% | 343 | soon | |
| 17 | AutoPIPEBentley | 94 | 30% | 326 | soon | |
| 18 | SlideRocscience | 92 | 30% | 261 | soon | |
| 19 | RocscienceRocscience | 86 | 28% | 218 | soon | |
| 20 | Tekla TeddsTrimble | 86 | 28% | 321 | soon | |
| 21 | OpenBridge ModelerBentley | 82 | 26% | 248 | soon | |
| 22 | gINTBentley | 81 | 26% | 329 | soon | |
| 23 | PLS-POLEPower Line Systems (Bentley) | 79 | 25% | 314 | soon | |
| 24 | SOFiSTiKSOFiSTiK | 74 | 24% | 212 | soon | |
| 25 | IDEA StatiCaIDEA StatiCa | 73 | 23% | 156 | soon | |
| 26 | 68 | 22% | 120 | soon | ||
| 27 | ADAPT-BuilderADAPT Corporation | 63 | 20% | 158 | soon | |
| 28 | SLOPE/WSeequent (Bentley) | 61 | 20% | 217 | soon | |
| 29 | CSiBridgeComputers and Structures | 60 | 19% | 228 | soon | |
| 30 | FLAC2D/3DItasca | 57 | 18% | 166 | soon | |
| 31 | PLS-TOWERPower Line Systems | 57 | 18% | 273 | soon | |
| 32 | Dlubal RSTABDlubal | 48 | 15% | 205 | soon | |
| 33 | Hilti PROFIS EngineeringHilti | 47 | 15% | 132 | soon | |
| 34 | FRILONemetschek | 46 | 15% | 41 | soon | |
| 35 | RAM Structural SystemBentley Systems | 45 | 14% | 160 | soon | |
| 36 | MFADBentley | 43 | 14% | 205 | soon | |
| 37 | MBS (Metal Building Software)MBS | 42 | 14% | 383 | soon | |
| 38 | Tekla Structural DesignerTrimble | 42 | 14% | 137 | soon | |
| 39 | Midas CivilMIDAS Information Technology | 41 | 13% | 124 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on ETABS users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 structural engineering are named by companies instead of ETABS: CSI SAFE by 560 companies, STAAD.Pro by 460, Tekla by 417, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/etabs/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
ETABS alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to ETABS?
CSI SAFE: 560 companies name it in their own job postings, against 311 for ETABS.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on ETABS
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.