Highway Capacity Software alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 civil infrastructure water are named by companies instead of Highway Capacity Software: Autodesk Civil 3D by 1,820 companies, HEC-RAS by 387, OpenRoads Designer by 355.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Highway Capacity Software, companies in postings
- 160
- Most used alternative
- Autodesk Civil 3D · 1,820
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Autodesk Civil 3D
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
civil infrastructure water companies choose instead of Highway Capacity Software
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Highway Capacity Software | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Autodesk Civil 3DAutodesk | 1,820 | 1138% | 11,902 | Highway Capacity Software vs Autodesk Civil 3D → | |
| 2 | HEC-RASUS Army Corps of Engineers | 387 | 242% | 1,251 | Highway Capacity Software vs HEC-RAS → | |
| 3 | OpenRoads DesignerBentley | 355 | 222% | 3,158 | Highway Capacity Software vs OpenRoads Designer → | |
| 4 | HEC-HMSUS Army Corps of Engineers | 233 | 146% | 665 | Highway Capacity Software vs HEC-HMS → | |
| 5 | EPA SWMMUS EPA | 182 | 114% | 526 | Highway Capacity Software vs EPA SWMM → | |
| 6 | HydroCADHydroCAD Software Solutions | 166 | 104% | 510 | Highway Capacity Software vs HydroCAD → | |
| 7 | PTV VissimPTV Group | 164 | 102% | 957 | Highway Capacity Software vs PTV Vissim → | |
| 8 | PLS-CADDPower Line Systems (Bentley) | 163 | 102% | 968 | Highway Capacity Software vs PLS-CADD → | |
| 9 | MXBentley Systems | 157 | 98% | 402 | Highway Capacity Software vs MX → | |
| 10 | InRoadsBentley Systems | 140 | 88% | 565 | Highway Capacity Software vs InRoads → | |
| 11 | Carlson SoftwareCarlson Software | 133 | 83% | 309 | Highway Capacity Software vs Carlson Software → | |
| 12 | GEOPAKBentley Systems | 132 | 83% | 445 | Highway Capacity Software vs GEOPAK → | |
| 13 | StormCADBentley Systems | 110 | 69% | 310 | soon | |
| 14 | WaterCADBentley Systems | 109 | 68% | 384 | soon | |
| 15 | InfoWorks ICMAutodesk | 107 | 67% | 403 | soon | |
| 16 | PCSWMMComputational Hydraulics International | 86 | 54% | 231 | soon | |
| 17 | HY-8FHWA | 85 | 53% | 142 | soon | |
| 18 | EPANETUS EPA | 81 | 51% | 161 | soon | |
| 19 | WaterGEMSBentley | 79 | 49% | 229 | soon | |
| 20 | AASHTOWareAASHTO | 76 | 48% | 232 | soon | |
| 21 | AutoTURNTransoft Solutions | 75 | 47% | 161 | soon | |
| 22 | MODFLOWUSGS | 75 | 47% | 187 | soon | |
| 23 | Autodesk InfraWorksAutodesk | 74 | 46% | 207 | soon | |
| 24 | SIDRA IntersectionAkcelik & Associates | 74 | 46% | 166 | soon | |
| 25 | 68 | 43% | 242 | soon | ||
| 26 | SynergiDNV | 67 | 42% | 131 | soon | |
| 27 | PTV VisumPTV Group | 62 | 39% | 107 | soon | |
| 28 | SewerGEMSBentley | 62 | 39% | 161 | soon | |
| 29 | ICPRStreamline Technologies | 61 | 38% | 113 | soon | |
| 30 | DHI MIKEDHI | 56 | 35% | 131 | soon | |
| 31 | HydraflowAutodesk | 56 | 35% | 107 | soon | |
| 32 | InfoWaterInnovyze | 55 | 34% | 147 | soon | |
| 33 | Bentley FlowMasterBentley | 53 | 33% | 87 | soon | |
| 34 | 12d Model12d Solutions | 51 | 32% | 277 | soon | |
| 35 | InfoDrainageAutodesk | 46 | 29% | 175 | soon | |
| 36 | LandFXLandFX | 42 | 26% | 78 | soon | |
| 37 | MicroDrainageCauseway | 41 | 26% | 177 | soon | |
| 38 | SimTrafficTrafficware | 41 | 26% | 72 | soon | |
| 39 | TUFLOWBMT | 37 | 23% | 183 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Highway Capacity Software users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 civil infrastructure water are named by companies instead of Highway Capacity Software: Autodesk Civil 3D by 1,820 companies, HEC-RAS by 387, OpenRoads Designer by 355, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/highway-capacity-software/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Highway Capacity Software alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Highway Capacity Software?
Autodesk Civil 3D: 1,820 companies name it in their own job postings, against 160 for Highway Capacity Software.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Highway Capacity Software
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.