Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · network protocols · Alternatives

HTTP Live Streaming alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 network protocols are named by companies instead of HTTP Live Streaming: TCP/IP by 5,615 companies, DNS by 3,903, DHCP by 2,671.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

HTTP Live Streaming, companies in postings
295
Most used alternative
TCP/IP · 5,615
Fastest hiring, 90 days
TCP/IP
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

network protocols companies choose instead of HTTP Live Streaming

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs HTTP Live Streamingpostings, 90 dCompare
1
TCP/IPIETF
5,6151903%16,228HTTP Live Streaming vs TCP/IP →
2
DNSIETF
3,9031323%8,974HTTP Live Streaming vs DNS →
3
DHCPIETF
2,671905%6,100HTTP Live Streaming vs DHCP →
4
2,080705%7,952HTTP Live Streaming vs Ethernet →
5
1,577535%2,947HTTP Live Streaming vs WebSocket →
6
1,467497%3,595HTTP Live Streaming vs SSL/TLS →
7
VLANIEEE
1,296439%2,706HTTP Live Streaming vs VLAN →
8
BGPIETF
1,261427%3,454HTTP Live Streaming vs BGP →
9
1,138386%2,311HTTP Live Streaming vs SFTP →
10
Wi-FiWi-Fi Alliance
1,003340%2,133HTTP Live Streaming vs Wi-Fi →
11
SSHIETF
865293%1,772HTTP Live Streaming vs SSH →
12
IPsecIETF
741251%1,728HTTP Live Streaming vs IPsec →
13
SNMPIETF
716243%1,675HTTP Live Streaming vs SNMP →
14
FTPIETF
710241%1,132HTTP Live Streaming vs FTP →
15
SIPIETF
608206%1,553HTTP Live Streaming vs SIP →
16
MPLSIETF
607206%1,626HTTP Live Streaming vs MPLS →
17
mTLSIETF
503171%1,177HTTP Live Streaming vs mTLS →
18
SMTPIETF
469159%832HTTP Live Streaming vs SMTP →
19
UDPIETF
448152%985HTTP Live Streaming vs UDP →
20
VXLANIETF
445151%1,514HTTP Live Streaming vs VXLAN →
21
444151%827HTTP Live Streaming vs WebRTC →
22
RTPIETF
417141%997HTTP Live Streaming vs RTP →
23
OSPFIETF
384130%921HTTP Live Streaming vs OSPF →
24
EIGRPCisco
362123%871HTTP Live Streaming vs EIGRP →
25
339115%848HTTP Live Streaming vs Spanning Tree Protocol →
26
IPv4IETF
332113%801HTTP Live Streaming vs IPv4 →
27
5G3GPP
306104%1,646HTTP Live Streaming vs 5G →
28
IPv6IETF
294100%689HTTP Live Streaming vs IPv6 →
29
LTE3GPP
28998%1,121HTTP Live Streaming vs LTE →
30
28195%673HTTP Live Streaming vs IEEE 802.1X →
31
NTPIETF
26489%524HTTP Live Streaming vs NTP →
32
NetFlowCisco
25988%599HTTP Live Streaming vs NetFlow →
33
EVPNIETF
25085%913HTTP Live Streaming vs EVPN →
34
RDMAIBTA
20971%1,140HTTP Live Streaming vs RDMA →
35
19566%963HTTP Live Streaming vs Precision Time Protocol →
36
AS2IETF
18663%370HTTP Live Streaming vs AS2 →
37
18362%480HTTP Live Streaming vs IEEE 802.11 →
38
18362%364HTTP Live Streaming vs Remote Desktop Protocol →
39
RoCEInfiniBand Trade Association
18262%968HTTP Live Streaming vs RoCE →
33,777 companies name a network protocol in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on HTTP Live Streaming users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 network protocols are named by companies instead of HTTP Live Streaming: TCP/IP by 5,615 companies, DNS by 3,903, DHCP by 2,671, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/http-live-streaming/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

HTTP Live Streaming alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to HTTP Live Streaming?

TCP/IP: 5,615 companies name it in their own job postings, against 295 for HTTP Live Streaming.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on HTTP Live Streaming
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market