Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · storage systems · Alternatives

iSCSI alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 storage systems are named by companies instead of iSCSI: Amazon S3 by 4,518 companies, Azure Data Lake Storage by 839, Google Cloud Storage by 775.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

iSCSI, companies in postings
264
Most used alternative
Amazon S3 · 4,518
Fastest hiring, 90 days
Amazon S3
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

storage systems companies choose instead of iSCSI

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs iSCSIpostings, 90 dCompare
1
Amazon S3Amazon
4,5181711%12,902iSCSI vs Amazon S3 →
2
Azure Data Lake StorageMicrosoft
839318%2,328iSCSI vs Azure Data Lake Storage →
3
Google Cloud StorageGoogle
775294%2,348iSCSI vs Google Cloud Storage →
4
Azure StorageMicrosoft
558211%1,328iSCSI vs Azure Storage →
5
NetAppNetApp
558211%2,240iSCSI vs NetApp →
6
CephCeph Foundation
390148%886iSCSI vs Ceph →
7
NFSIETF
382145%1,073iSCSI vs NFS →
8
Hadoop Distributed File SystemApache Software Foundation
323122%781iSCSI vs Hadoop Distributed File System →
9
Dell EMCDell Technologies
303115%707iSCSI vs Dell EMC →
10
Azure Blob StorageMicrosoft
282107%649iSCSI vs Azure Blob Storage →
11
Pure StoragePure Storage
22987%665iSCSI vs Pure Storage →
12
NVMeNVM Express
19373%1,159iSCSI vs NVMe →
13
Microsoft DFSMicrosoft
18771%375iSCSI vs Microsoft DFS →
14
MinIOMinIO
16563%320iSCSI vs MinIO →
15
Fibre ChannelINCITS
14455%308iSCSI vs Fibre Channel →
16
LustreOpenSFS
13551%391iSCSI vs Lustre →
17
VAST DataVAST Data
12146%378iSCSI vs VAST Data →
18
IBM Spectrum ScaleIBM
10640%320soon
19
ZFSOpenZFS
10540%192soon
20
NTFSMicrosoft
9034%148soon
21
Dell PowerScaleDell Technologies
8733%242soon
22
WEKAWekaIO
8733%236soon
23
LVMLinux
7930%226soon
24
SynologySynology
7830%132soon
25
NetApp ONTAPNetApp
7729%353soon
26
Nimble StorageHPE
7328%167soon
27
SATASerial ATA International Organization
7328%448soon
28
SambaSamba Team
5922%99soon
29
Dell PowerStoreDell Technologies
5722%112soon
30
eMMCJEDEC
5521%154soon
31
Amazon S3 GlacierAmazon Web Services
5019%99soon
32
BeeGFSThinkParallel
4116%71soon
33
Universal Flash Storage (UFS)JEDEC
4116%241soon
34
Azure FilesMicrosoft
4015%86soon
35
RookCNCF
4015%51soon
36
Cisco MDSCisco
3915%72soon
37
LonghornCNCF
3614%72soon
38
Dell PowerMaxDell Technologies
3513%83soon
39
DDNDataDirect Networks
3112%123soon
11,745 companies name a storage system in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on iSCSI users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Get the full list Watch this category

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 storage systems are named by companies instead of iSCSI: Amazon S3 by 4,518 companies, Azure Data Lake Storage by 839, Google Cloud Storage by 775, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/iscsi/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

iSCSI alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to iSCSI?

Amazon S3: 4,518 companies name it in their own job postings, against 264 for iSCSI.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on iSCSI
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

Start free
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market