Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · network protocols · Alternatives

Precision Time Protocol alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 network protocols are named by companies instead of Precision Time Protocol: TCP/IP by 5,615 companies, DNS by 3,903, DHCP by 2,671.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Precision Time Protocol, companies in postings
195
Most used alternative
TCP/IP · 5,615
Fastest hiring, 90 days
TCP/IP
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

network protocols companies choose instead of Precision Time Protocol

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs Precision Time Protocolpostings, 90 dCompare
1
TCP/IPIETF
5,6152879%16,228Precision Time Protocol vs TCP/IP →
2
DNSIETF
3,9032002%8,974Precision Time Protocol vs DNS →
3
DHCPIETF
2,6711370%6,100Precision Time Protocol vs DHCP →
4
2,0801067%7,952Precision Time Protocol vs Ethernet →
5
1,577809%2,947Precision Time Protocol vs WebSocket →
6
1,467752%3,595Precision Time Protocol vs SSL/TLS →
7
VLANIEEE
1,296665%2,706Precision Time Protocol vs VLAN →
8
BGPIETF
1,261647%3,454Precision Time Protocol vs BGP →
9
1,138584%2,311Precision Time Protocol vs SFTP →
10
Wi-FiWi-Fi Alliance
1,003514%2,133Precision Time Protocol vs Wi-Fi →
11
SSHIETF
865444%1,772Precision Time Protocol vs SSH →
12
IPsecIETF
741380%1,728Precision Time Protocol vs IPsec →
13
SNMPIETF
716367%1,675Precision Time Protocol vs SNMP →
14
FTPIETF
710364%1,132Precision Time Protocol vs FTP →
15
SIPIETF
608312%1,553Precision Time Protocol vs SIP →
16
MPLSIETF
607311%1,626Precision Time Protocol vs MPLS →
17
mTLSIETF
503258%1,177Precision Time Protocol vs mTLS →
18
SMTPIETF
469241%832Precision Time Protocol vs SMTP →
19
UDPIETF
448230%985Precision Time Protocol vs UDP →
20
VXLANIETF
445228%1,514Precision Time Protocol vs VXLAN →
21
444228%827Precision Time Protocol vs WebRTC →
22
RTPIETF
417214%997Precision Time Protocol vs RTP →
23
OSPFIETF
384197%921Precision Time Protocol vs OSPF →
24
EIGRPCisco
362186%871Precision Time Protocol vs EIGRP →
25
339174%848Precision Time Protocol vs Spanning Tree Protocol →
26
IPv4IETF
332170%801Precision Time Protocol vs IPv4 →
27
5G3GPP
306157%1,646Precision Time Protocol vs 5G →
28
295151%715Precision Time Protocol vs HTTP Live Streaming →
29
IPv6IETF
294151%689Precision Time Protocol vs IPv6 →
30
LTE3GPP
289148%1,121Precision Time Protocol vs LTE →
31
281144%673Precision Time Protocol vs IEEE 802.1X →
32
NTPIETF
264135%524Precision Time Protocol vs NTP →
33
NetFlowCisco
259133%599Precision Time Protocol vs NetFlow →
34
EVPNIETF
250128%913Precision Time Protocol vs EVPN →
35
RDMAIBTA
209107%1,140Precision Time Protocol vs RDMA →
36
AS2IETF
18695%370Precision Time Protocol vs AS2 →
37
18394%480Precision Time Protocol vs IEEE 802.11 →
38
18394%364Precision Time Protocol vs Remote Desktop Protocol →
39
RoCEInfiniBand Trade Association
18293%968Precision Time Protocol vs RoCE →
33,777 companies name a network protocol in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on Precision Time Protocol users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 network protocols are named by companies instead of Precision Time Protocol: TCP/IP by 5,615 companies, DNS by 3,903, DHCP by 2,671, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/precision-time-protocol/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

Precision Time Protocol alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to Precision Time Protocol?

TCP/IP: 5,615 companies name it in their own job postings, against 195 for Precision Time Protocol.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on Precision Time Protocol
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market