Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · library scholarly resources · Alternatives

PubMed alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 9 library scholarly resources are named by companies instead of PubMed: EndNote by 106 companies, OCLC by 57, arXiv by 50.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

PubMed, companies in postings
134
Most used alternative
EndNote · 106
Fastest hiring, 90 days
UpToDate
Alternatives ranked
9
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

library scholarly resources companies choose instead of PubMed

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs PubMedpostings, 90 dCompare
1
EndNoteClarivate
10679%176PubMed vs EndNote →
2
OCLCOCLC
5743%75soon
3
arXivCornell University
5037%90soon
4
UpToDateWolters Kluwer
4937%624soon
5
LibGuidesSpringshare
4836%35soon
6
RDAAmerican Library Association
4332%102soon
7
FOLIOOpen Library Foundation
3425%51soon
8
MARC 21Library of Congress
2216%33soon
9
MicromedexMerative
118%428soon
554 companies name a library scholarly resource in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on PubMed users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

9 library scholarly resources are named by companies instead of PubMed: EndNote by 106 companies, OCLC by 57, arXiv by 50, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/pubmed/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

PubMed alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to PubMed?

EndNote: 106 companies name it in their own job postings, against 134 for PubMed.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on PubMed
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market