Start free
Tools · Category

library scholarly resources, ranked by real usage_

As of 4 November 2026, PubMed leads library scholarly resources with 134 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of EndNote at 106.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Leader
PubMed · 134
Runner-up
EndNote · 106
Most hiring, 90 days
UpToDate
Highest postings per company
Micromedex
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
554companies across the category
24%of them on PubMed
1,846postings naming a library scholarly resource in 90 days
10tools with enough evidence to rank
02 — Ranking

Every library scholarly resource we can measure

Companies naming the tool, and postings naming it in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the leader.

#ToolCompaniescompaniesPostings, 90 dayspostingsper company
1
PubMedNIH National Library of Medicine
134
2321.7
2
EndNoteClarivate
106
1761.7
3
OCLCOCLC
57
751.3
4
arXivCornell University
50
901.8
5
UpToDateWolters Kluwer
49
62412.7
6
LibGuidesSpringshare
48
350.7
7
RDAAmerican Library Association
43
1022.4
8
FOLIOOpen Library Foundation
34
511.5
9
MARC 21Library of Congress
22
331.5
10
MicromedexMerative
11
42838.9
03 — Head to head

Compare two tools

Same data, two columns: who chooses which by size, industry and country.

PubMed vs EndNote134 · 106
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

PubMed leads library scholarly resources with 134 companies naming it in job postings, ahead of EndNote at 106. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/category/library-scholarly-resources)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • CatalogueBreaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov: 6,296 tools with vendor and category, editions folded into their parent.
  • CompaniesCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, any confidence. Candidate wish-lists excluded.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not countedTools used by teams that do not post jobs, and companies without a career site we can read.
FAQ

library scholarly resources: questions

How is this ranking made?

By the number of companies whose own job postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue (version T-1.0.1-prov). No vendor paid for a position and no editor chose the order.

Why is this different from review-site rankings?

Review sites rank by reviews collected. This ranks by companies hiring people to work in the tool, which is closer to seats in use. It under-counts tools used by teams that rarely post jobs.

What about product editions?

Editions and sub-products () are counted under the parent so no company is counted twice.

Can I get the companies behind a number?

Yes: click a tool, see the first 20, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get the companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on every tool,
ranked by what they say

Connect the MCP server, ask which companies run a tool, and get 1,000 records free.

Start free with 1,000 records
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market, 1,000 records free