Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · api specs data formats · Alternatives

XBRL alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of XBRL: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

XBRL, companies in postings
152
Most used alternative
JSON · 6,396
Fastest hiring, 90 days
JSON
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

api specs data formats companies choose instead of XBRL

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs XBRLpostings, 90 dCompare
1
JSONEcma International
6,3964208%19,737XBRL vs JSON →
2
XMLW3C
5,2643463%12,841XBRL vs XML →
3
Model Context ProtocolAnthropic
4,8923218%16,002XBRL vs Model Context Protocol →
4
GraphQLGraphQL Foundation
4,0892690%12,076XBRL vs GraphQL →
5
SOAPW3C
3,6612409%10,243XBRL vs SOAP →
6
gRPCCloud Native Computing Foundation
1,7531153%4,571XBRL vs gRPC →
7
OpenAPIOpenAPI Initiative
1,432942%3,245XBRL vs OpenAPI →
8
YAMLYAML Language Development Team
1,029677%2,569XBRL vs YAML →
9
Microsoft GraphMicrosoft
942620%2,115XBRL vs Microsoft Graph →
10
ODataOASIS
844555%3,073XBRL vs OData →
11
XSLTW3C
820539%1,501XBRL vs XSLT →
12
CSVIETF
782514%1,180XBRL vs CSV →
13
SAP IDocSAP
722475%2,746XBRL vs SAP IDoc →
14
Apache ParquetApache Software Foundation
690454%1,246XBRL vs Apache Parquet →
15
Protocol BuffersGoogle
566372%1,102XBRL vs Protocol Buffers →
16
Agent2Agent (A2A) ProtocolLinux Foundation
443291%1,572XBRL vs Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol →
17
PDFAdobe
405266%839XBRL vs PDF →
18
ANSI X12ASC X12
371244%761XBRL vs ANSI X12 →
19
Markdown
337222%585XBRL vs Markdown →
20
XML Schema (XSD)W3C
291191%551XBRL vs XML Schema (XSD) →
21
Apache AvroApache Software Foundation
280184%560XBRL vs Apache Avro →
22
ISO 20022ISO
272179%763XBRL vs ISO 20022 →
23
WSDLW3C
256168%511XBRL vs WSDL →
24
UN/EDIFACTUnited Nations
253166%406XBRL vs UN/EDIFACT →
25
RDFW3C
221145%813XBRL vs RDF →
26
Web Ontology LanguageW3C
216142%703XBRL vs Web Ontology Language →
27
JSON SchemaJSON Schema organization
169111%301XBRL vs JSON Schema →
28
H.264ITU-T / ISO
160105%327XBRL vs H.264 →
29
RedfishDMTF
13790%661XBRL vs Redfish →
30
H.265ITU-T
12683%244soon
31
RSSRSS Advisory Board
12280%321soon
32
Apache ORCApache Software Foundation
11878%235soon
33
tRPCtRPC contributors
10670%188soon
34
RAMLMuleSoft
10569%187soon
35
Schema.orgSchema.org
10368%148soon
36
JSON-LDW3C
9965%146soon
37
DITAOASIS
9663%197soon
38
YANGIETF
8959%286soon
39
OpenUSDAlliance for OpenUSD
8858%291soon
38,897 companies name a api specs data format in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on XBRL users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Get the full list Watch this category

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of XBRL: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/xbrl/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

XBRL alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to XBRL?

JSON: 6,396 companies name it in their own job postings, against 152 for XBRL.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

SearchCompany searchFilter on what a company actually does→SearchPeople searchDecision makers, normalized and verified→MCP and APICompanies over MCP and APICount, search and export from your agent→DatasetCompany and People datasetThe whole market in your warehouse→DataCoverage by countryCheck your market before you start→SearchLocal businessesThe same database, by category and city→

Every company on XBRL
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

Start free
  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market