Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEAnsible VS Azure Bicep_
As of 4 November 2026, Azure Bicep is named by 1,311 companies and Ansible by 5,846; Ansible skews to companies under 200 people (45% vs 34%), Azure Bicep to companies over 1,000 (38% vs 30%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Ansible's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Azure Bicep rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Ansible: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- Azure Bicep: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- Ansible: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Azure Bicep: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.9 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Ansible | share | Azure Bicep | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 136 | 2% | 16 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 426 | 7% | 76 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 943 | 16% | 135 | 10% | Ansible |
| 51-200 employees | 1,287 | 22% | 234 | 18% | Ansible |
| 201-500 employees | 803 | 14% | 217 | 17% | Azure Bicep |
| 501-1000 employees | 518 | 9% | 134 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 838 | 14% | 241 | 18% | Azure Bicep |
| 5001-10000 employees | 263 | 4% | 85 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 632 | 11% | 173 | 13% | Azure Bicep |
| Segment | Ansible | share | Azure Bicep | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 2,974 | 51% | 610 | 47% | Ansible |
| Business & finance services | 1,101 | 19% | 303 | 23% | Azure Bicep |
| Manufacturing & industry | 553 | 9% | 125 | 10% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 218 | 4% | 42 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 190 | 3% | 24 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 168 | 3% | 31 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 163 | 3% | 33 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 145 | 2% | 37 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 90 | 2% | 25 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 76 | 1% | 32 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 64 | 1% | 25 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 61 | 1% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Ansible | share | Azure Bicep | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 3,150 | 54% | 651 | 50% | Ansible |
| Germany | 443 | 8% | 69 | 5% | Ansible |
| United Kingdom | 354 | 6% | 116 | 9% | Azure Bicep |
| France | 278 | 5% | 24 | 2% | Ansible |
| India | 154 | 3% | 34 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 118 | 2% | 45 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 92 | 2% | 63 | 5% | Azure Bicep |
| Poland | 79 | 1% | 18 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 76 | 1% | 31 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 74 | 1% | 31 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 73 | 1% | 20 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 61 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 24 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ansible | share | Azure Bicep | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 12,055 | 41% | 1,447 | 37% | Ansible |
| IT operations & business systems | 10,959 | 37% | 1,402 | 36% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1,014 | 3% | 95 | 2% | even |
| Data & AI | 821 | 3% | 468 | 12% | Azure Bicep |
| Sales | 334 | 1% | 14 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 254 | 1% | 14 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 182 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 79 | 0% | 17 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 58 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 42 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 31 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 27 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 23 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 12 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| healthcare clinical | 12 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| research and science | 10 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 5 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| social care and community | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| real estate and property | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Ansible →
Companies using Azure Bicep →
iac config management ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Azure Bicep is named by 1,311 companies in job postings and Ansible by 5,846; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ansible-vs-azure-bicep)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Ansible vs Azure Bicep: questions
Which is more used, Ansible or Azure Bicep?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Ansible (5,846) over Azure Bicep (1,311). By website-and-DNS footprint, Azure Bicep (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Ansible?
45% of Ansible companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for Azure Bicep. 30% of Ansible companies have over 1,000 employees, against 38% for Azure Bicep.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Ansible in marketing and Azure Bicep in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Ansible or Azure Bicep, and get 1,000 records free.