Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEApache Flink VS Google Cloud Dataflow_
As of 4 November 2026, Google Cloud Dataflow is named by 490 companies and Apache Flink by 943; Apache Flink skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 38%), Google Cloud Dataflow to companies over 1,000 (40% vs 33%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Flink's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Google Cloud Dataflow rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Apache Flink: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- Google Cloud Dataflow: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Apache Flink: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Google Cloud Dataflow: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 3.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Apache Flink | share | Google Cloud Dataflow | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 31 | 3% | 9 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 88 | 9% | 28 | 6% | Apache Flink |
| 11-50 employees | 122 | 13% | 60 | 12% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 162 | 17% | 96 | 20% | Google Cloud Dataflow |
| 201-500 employees | 136 | 14% | 64 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 93 | 10% | 39 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 158 | 17% | 81 | 17% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 43 | 5% | 27 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 110 | 12% | 86 | 18% | Google Cloud Dataflow |
| Segment | Apache Flink | share | Google Cloud Dataflow | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 498 | 53% | 239 | 49% | Apache Flink |
| Business & finance services | 190 | 20% | 114 | 23% | Google Cloud Dataflow |
| Manufacturing & industry | 57 | 6% | 27 | 6% | even |
| Media & content | 54 | 6% | 19 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 29 | 3% | 26 | 5% | Google Cloud Dataflow |
| Consumer services & leisure | 21 | 2% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 21 | 2% | 15 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 17 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 14 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 11 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 9 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Flink | share | Google Cloud Dataflow | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 622 | 66% | 268 | 55% | Apache Flink |
| United Kingdom | 43 | 5% | 31 | 6% | even |
| Germany | 41 | 4% | 17 | 3% | even |
| India | 18 | 2% | 23 | 5% | Google Cloud Dataflow |
| Singapore | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 12 | 1% | 19 | 4% | Google Cloud Dataflow |
| Australia | 11 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 11 | 1% | 17 | 3% | Google Cloud Dataflow |
| Spain | 10 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | 10 | 1% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 9 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 10 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Flink | share | Google Cloud Dataflow | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 1,560 | 46% | 1,296 | 59% | Google Cloud Dataflow |
| Software engineering | 1,239 | 37% | 304 | 14% | Apache Flink |
| IT operations & business systems | 129 | 4% | 106 | 5% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 28 | 1% | 18 | 1% | even |
| Retail & store operations | 27 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 23 | 1% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 21 | 1% | 13 | 1% | even |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 17 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 16 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 8 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 8 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 7 | 0% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 3 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| hospitality and food service | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| skilled trades and field service | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| healthcare clinical | – | – | 90 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 9 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| real estate and property | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| agriculture and environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| manufacturing and production | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Apache Flink →
Companies using Google Cloud Dataflow →
distributed processing ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Google Cloud Dataflow is named by 490 companies in job postings and Apache Flink by 943; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-flink-vs-google-cloud-dataflow)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Apache Flink vs Google Cloud Dataflow: questions
Which is more used, Apache Flink or Google Cloud Dataflow?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Flink (943) over Google Cloud Dataflow (490). By website-and-DNS footprint, Google Cloud Dataflow (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Apache Flink?
39% of Apache Flink companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Google Cloud Dataflow. 33% of Apache Flink companies have over 1,000 employees, against 40% for Google Cloud Dataflow.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Flink in marketing and Google Cloud Dataflow in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Apache Flink or Google Cloud Dataflow, and get 1,000 records free.