Apache Iceberg VS Microsoft OneLake_
As of 4 November 2026, Microsoft OneLake is named by 306 companies and Apache Iceberg by 872; Apache Iceberg skews to companies under 200 people (36% vs 23%), Microsoft OneLake to companies over 1,000 (47% vs 37%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Apache Iceberg's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft OneLake rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Apache Iceberg: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- Microsoft OneLake: 2–200 employees
- 23%
- Apache Iceberg: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Microsoft OneLake: 1,000+ employees
- 47%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.4 · 2.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Apache Iceberg | share | Microsoft OneLake | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 25 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Apache Iceberg |
| 2-10 employees | 66 | 8% | 13 | 4% | Apache Iceberg |
| 11-50 employees | 91 | 10% | 13 | 4% | Apache Iceberg |
| 51-200 employees | 160 | 18% | 45 | 15% | Apache Iceberg |
| 201-500 employees | 110 | 13% | 44 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 101 | 12% | 45 | 15% | Microsoft OneLake |
| 1001-5000 employees | 154 | 18% | 82 | 27% | Microsoft OneLake |
| 5001-10000 employees | 48 | 6% | 16 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 117 | 13% | 46 | 15% | even |
| Segment | Apache Iceberg | share | Microsoft OneLake | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 459 | 53% | 105 | 34% | Apache Iceberg |
| Business & finance services | 207 | 24% | 67 | 22% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 62 | 7% | 41 | 13% | Microsoft OneLake |
| Media & content | 42 | 5% | 8 | 3% | Apache Iceberg |
| Public, community & associations | 25 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 16 | 2% | 10 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 15 | 2% | 11 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 2% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 11 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 5 | 1% | 13 | 4% | Microsoft OneLake |
| Health care | 4 | 0% | 12 | 4% | Microsoft OneLake |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 13 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Iceberg | share | Microsoft OneLake | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 556 | 64% | 180 | 59% | Apache Iceberg |
| United Kingdom | 54 | 6% | 26 | 8% | Microsoft OneLake |
| Germany | 35 | 4% | 10 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 22 | 3% | 15 | 5% | Microsoft OneLake |
| India | 20 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| France | 15 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 13 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | 13 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 12 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 7 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Belgium | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Apache Iceberg | share | Microsoft OneLake | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 1,586 | 60% | 521 | 73% | Microsoft OneLake |
| Software engineering | 584 | 22% | 34 | 5% | Apache Iceberg |
| IT operations & business systems | 56 | 2% | 38 | 5% | Microsoft OneLake |
| Product, program & project management | 49 | 2% | 19 | 3% | even |
| Sales | 36 | 1% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 16 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 15 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 10 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| research and science | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Apache Iceberg →
Companies using Microsoft OneLake →
lakehouse table formats ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft OneLake is named by 306 companies in job postings and Apache Iceberg by 872; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/apache-iceberg-vs-onelake)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Apache Iceberg vs Microsoft OneLake: questions
Which is more used, Apache Iceberg or Microsoft OneLake?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Apache Iceberg (872) over Microsoft OneLake (306). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft OneLake (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Apache Iceberg?
36% of Apache Iceberg companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 23% for Microsoft OneLake. 37% of Apache Iceberg companies have over 1,000 employees, against 47% for Microsoft OneLake.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Apache Iceberg in marketing and Microsoft OneLake in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Apache Iceberg or Microsoft OneLake, and get 1,000 records free.