Shipvane · 4 AE roles
Marco E. · joined Cargolio
Fleetora · first roles in DEArgo CD VS GitHub Actions_
As of 4 November 2026, GitHub Actions is named by 6,089 companies and Argo CD by 2,387; Argo CD skews to companies under 200 people (43% vs 47%), GitHub Actions to companies over 1,000 (26% vs 30%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Argo CD's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GitHub Actions rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Argo CD: 2–200 employees
- 43%
- GitHub Actions: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- Argo CD: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- GitHub Actions: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.5 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Argo CD | share | GitHub Actions | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 71 | 3% | 196 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 179 | 7% | 577 | 9% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 294 | 12% | 989 | 16% | GitHub Actions |
| 51-200 employees | 544 | 23% | 1,322 | 22% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 359 | 15% | 856 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 232 | 10% | 582 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 335 | 14% | 792 | 13% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 103 | 4% | 236 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 270 | 11% | 539 | 9% | Argo CD |
| Segment | Argo CD | share | GitHub Actions | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 1,338 | 56% | 3,242 | 53% | Argo CD |
| Business & finance services | 453 | 19% | 1,208 | 20% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 181 | 8% | 500 | 8% | even |
| Media & content | 95 | 4% | 233 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 58 | 2% | 123 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 51 | 2% | 105 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 50 | 2% | 177 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 46 | 2% | 153 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 37 | 2% | 83 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 23 | 1% | 74 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 20 | 1% | 53 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 19 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 76 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Argo CD | share | GitHub Actions | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,342 | 56% | 3,555 | 58% | GitHub Actions |
| United Kingdom | 165 | 7% | 497 | 8% | even |
| Germany | 150 | 6% | 283 | 5% | even |
| France | 92 | 4% | 142 | 2% | even |
| India | 48 | 2% | 183 | 3% | even |
| Sweden | 48 | 2% | 78 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 42 | 2% | 79 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 39 | 2% | 146 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 35 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 34 | 1% | 84 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 29 | 1% | 86 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 29 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 60 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 60 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Argo CD | share | GitHub Actions | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 5,229 | 69% | 13,951 | 65% | Argo CD |
| IT operations & business systems | 906 | 12% | 2,161 | 10% | even |
| Data & AI | 490 | 6% | 2,444 | 11% | GitHub Actions |
| Engineering (non-software) | 74 | 1% | 388 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 48 | 1% | 138 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 23 | 0% | 80 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 19 | 0% | 52 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 12 | 0% | 44 | 0% | even |
| Travel, leisure & events | 11 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 9 | 0% | 11 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 8 | 0% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 6 | 0% | 133 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 4 | 0% | 31 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 3 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| construction and civil | 3 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| research and science | 3 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | 11 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 2 | 0% | 15 | 0% | even |
| logistics warehouse and transport | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| real estate and property | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| skilled trades and field service | 2 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| healthcare clinical | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| hospitality and food service | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| manufacturing and production | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | – | – | 13 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| arts media and entertainment | – | – | 8 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Argo CD →
Companies using GitHub Actions →
ci cd ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
GitHub Actions is named by 6,089 companies in job postings and Argo CD by 2,387; 1,275 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/argo-cd-vs-github-actions)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Argo CD vs GitHub Actions: questions
Which is more used, Argo CD or GitHub Actions?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, GitHub Actions (6,089) over Argo CD (2,387). By website-and-DNS footprint, GitHub Actions (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Argo CD?
43% of Argo CD companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 47% for GitHub Actions. 30% of Argo CD companies have over 1,000 employees, against 26% for GitHub Actions.
Do companies run both?
1,275 companies name both in their postings, usually Argo CD in marketing and GitHub Actions in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Argo CD or GitHub Actions, and get 1,000 records free.